Forward from: Facts behind Terrorism and Telegram by GRT ( ISIS / Hamas / Gaza - Palestine / Al-Qa'ida )
Utøya - Muslim Part 2
In Breivik’s construction of the world, he is strongly influenced by what is usually called the “Eurabian literature” and the conspiracy theory articulated within this genre. Eurabian literature consists of well-known writers such as xxxx and xxxx, but there are many writers and proponents within the genre.
Eurabian literature claims that the Euro-Arabic dialogue network has infiltrated and reached all European influential sectors, such as political parties, media, the financial sector, and the intelligentsia.
Therefore, Europe will soon be subsumed under Islam and Muslim sharia laws. Europe is also depicted as old, tired, decadent, spiritually weakened, and slowly dying because of the apathy of its own native people.
Breivik views the 1950s as a golden era, where everything seemed idyllic and harmonious.
Breivik particularly accuses higher education of restricting the freedom to articulate and discuss ideas, especially in the curriculum.
Although Breivik positions himself as a Christian, he is not particularly religious.
Thus, when Breivik justifies his killing spree by claiming, among other things, to be the “liberator of mankind”, he may be a hero in his own eyes. However, this has little to do with reality, precisely because not (nearly) everyone regarded themselves as unfree, at least not in Norway, the Western world and probably also not in the rest of the world. Thus, Breivik is apparently living completely in his own world and for this very reason was deemed – completely correctly – insane.
He shared his views of the current situation in Norway and Europe, the “Eurabia the- sis” and the metaphors of “self-defence”, “betrayals” and “traitors” with many others and more or less copied text from their “counter-jihadist” web pages.
He sees himself not only as a liberator but also as a terrifier, for example when he realistically observes: “I know that it was cruel, that I have inflicted indescribable grief"
In Breivik’s construction of the world, he is strongly influenced by what is usually called the “Eurabian literature” and the conspiracy theory articulated within this genre. Eurabian literature consists of well-known writers such as xxxx and xxxx, but there are many writers and proponents within the genre.
Eurabian literature claims that the Euro-Arabic dialogue network has infiltrated and reached all European influential sectors, such as political parties, media, the financial sector, and the intelligentsia.
Therefore, Europe will soon be subsumed under Islam and Muslim sharia laws. Europe is also depicted as old, tired, decadent, spiritually weakened, and slowly dying because of the apathy of its own native people.
Breivik views the 1950s as a golden era, where everything seemed idyllic and harmonious.
Breivik particularly accuses higher education of restricting the freedom to articulate and discuss ideas, especially in the curriculum.
Although Breivik positions himself as a Christian, he is not particularly religious.
Thus, when Breivik justifies his killing spree by claiming, among other things, to be the “liberator of mankind”, he may be a hero in his own eyes. However, this has little to do with reality, precisely because not (nearly) everyone regarded themselves as unfree, at least not in Norway, the Western world and probably also not in the rest of the world. Thus, Breivik is apparently living completely in his own world and for this very reason was deemed – completely correctly – insane.
He shared his views of the current situation in Norway and Europe, the “Eurabia the- sis” and the metaphors of “self-defence”, “betrayals” and “traitors” with many others and more or less copied text from their “counter-jihadist” web pages.
He sees himself not only as a liberator but also as a terrifier, for example when he realistically observes: “I know that it was cruel, that I have inflicted indescribable grief"