Knowing the Will of the Conscious Metadivine Entity (God):
While the CMDE has absolute standards of morality, it has to be known. The difficulty, especially in religious texts, is knowing which is correct in expressing the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality.
This brings us to the divide within the CMDE, personal and impersonal, known as Theism and Deism, respectfully. The divide is a question of if the CMDE has provided revelation of it's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality to the universe.
Theism (personal) posits the CMDE has interacted with the universe and provided this; while Deism (impersonal) posits the CMDE never has and never will interact with the universe.
Deism relies on observation of what the CMDE created (the universe) to infer the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality; while Theism relies on revelation, whether oral or recorded, to infer the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality.
Both of which can be equally as subjective, through: mans fallible observation of creation, or mans fallible identification of revelation and interpretation of revelation.
While the CMDE has absolute standards of morality, it has to be known. The difficulty, especially in religious texts, is knowing which is correct in expressing the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality.
This brings us to the divide within the CMDE, personal and impersonal, known as Theism and Deism, respectfully. The divide is a question of if the CMDE has provided revelation of it's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality to the universe.
Theism (personal) posits the CMDE has interacted with the universe and provided this; while Deism (impersonal) posits the CMDE never has and never will interact with the universe.
Deism relies on observation of what the CMDE created (the universe) to infer the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality; while Theism relies on revelation, whether oral or recorded, to infer the CMDE's sovereign Will and absolute standards of morality.
Both of which can be equally as subjective, through: mans fallible observation of creation, or mans fallible identification of revelation and interpretation of revelation.