Mike Peinovich⚡️⚡️🔻


Channel's geo and language: USA, English
Category: Politics


TRS host. This is my only official channel.

Related channels  |  Similar channels

Channel's geo and language
USA, English
Category
Politics
Statistics
Posts filter


The Jewish Resnicks and their control over billions of gallons of water in California is just one part of a much larger issue. Greater LA as a place where 18 million people live wouldn't exist if not for Jews avoiding Thomas Edison's Motion Picture Co. patents in the early 1900s.

In 1900 The LA area was home to about 170k people, mostly involved in the oil business and citrus farming. Jews moved there to avoid Thomas Edison's control over movie camera technology and his desire to use it to keep the movie business clean and wholesome. By contrast, NYC was home to 3.5 million people in 1900. NYC's population has grown 2.5x since then while Greater LA's population has grown 100x. This is ultimately due to Jews moving there and founding the six major studios, avoiding both patent regulation and moral codes.

Unlike oil and citrus, there is no inherent reason for the movie business to be in LA, like there is no inherent reason for gambling to be in LV. Jews chose these places due to cheap real estate and lax regulation, allowing them to set up their own system in these desert regions. LA is naturally arid and prone to wildfires. Creating a sprawling city of wood frame houses in tight proximity was always an accident waiting to happen. The Resnicks control of water and farming is just the latest manifestation of the larger Jewish oligarchy in California.

It would be difficult to trace their control of water directly to the fires, though connections could no doubt be found. But the larger picture is the social and environmental distortions created by Jewish power.

The below quote by Neil Gabler makes the case from the other side. Gabler is a Jew who wrote the book on the Jewish history of Hollywood, and its similarity to Zionism. Jews seek out desert regions to set up new societies and skirt the rules of established civilization. However, nature seems to reject these projects and they tend to go up flames. Gabler's rhetoric is just Jewish mythmaking and ballfanning about their own manifest destiny. Palestine was already populated and they used direct force in addition to money power from generations of usury and banking control in Europe to seize it. LA they just bought cheap.

The reality is that Jews are just are petty, vindictive, tyrannical and violent usurers and criminals that exploit weaknesses in gentile societies to create alternate power and control systems to their own benefit regardless of environmental and social damage.

https://fixupx.com/tombelaviv_/status/1878178214234734597




Interesting article in the Times of Israel shows how flexible Jews are with the categories of left and right and weighs approaches to furthering Jewish power from each camp. The only approach not considered is changing Jewish behavior toward others.

"Anti-semitism" can be understood as ideas or viewpoints that are threatening to Jewish supremacy. The article also shows how Jews across all political camps see these political affiliations as mechanisms for promoting Jewish power and not as value sets in themselves.

Jews seem to consider using hard power against "anti-semites" through law enforcement and lawsuits to be a "right" oriented approach, which is funny because that contradicts the gentile conception of right and left, where using authoritarian methods to "fight hate" is left coded. This makes sense from the Jewish perspective though where "right" means the use of force to defeat and destroy the enemies of Jews while the "left" favors collaborating with gentiles to reduce threats to Jews. Which raises some interesting problems.

In terms of anti-semitism, left coded approaches have been successful for Jews, but only if you understand anti-semitism to be personal antipathy towards Jewish people. But people that don't see themselves as Jew-haters can still be threats to Jewish supremacy. This is why the IHRA created a comprehensive definition of anti-semitism, which includes any idea that threatens Jewish supremacy. But the more they enforce this through legal means, the more personal hatred of Jews they will engender. It's a constant balancing act.

All Jews in political life have to be seen as agents of Jewish supremacy first and foremost. No matter what pretense they are putting up or what values they espouse, their primary reason for engaging in any political activity is to advance their own racial power.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/realizing-old-tactics-arent-enough-us-jewish-groups-use-science-to-fight-antisemitism/




Forward from: Information Liberation
A US district judge threw out and mocked a "disingenuous" discrimination lawsuit against Haverford College from a Jewish lawfare group seeking to exploit Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act to silence criticism of Israel on college campuses.

Judge Gerald McHugh wrote:

At this stage, a court would typically review the relevant facts. I cannot cogently do so here due to the sprawling and disorganized character of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint, which appears to detail every frustration and disagreement of Jewish students and faculty that has occurred at Haverford over the last year. It spills pages of ink on lengthy frolics about events on other college campuses and about ideological debates. Rather than isolating instances of harassment and logically relating them to the elements of a hostile environment claim, Plaintiffs set forth a running list of grievances that reads more as an opinion editorial than it does a legal complaint.

Some of the instances alleged are concerning, and if pled properly, could perhaps support a cognizable legal claim under Title VI. Yet, the Complaint is diluted by instances that no reasonable person could construe as intentional discrimination. For example, Plaintiffs contend that Haverford did not announce the month of May as "American Jewish History Month," and instead only celebrated "Asian American/Pacific Islander Month." Or, Plaintiffs complain that some graduating students at the Spring 2024 commencement donned attire that signified their support for Palestinians—a classic example of protected First Amendment expression. Elsewhere, Plaintiffs include comments made by a professor who does not even attend Haverford. As a result of Plaintiffs' scattered pleading, any serious allegations of actionable discrimination are buried as needles within a haystack of distraction.

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=64799


Forward from: Bellerophon's Autism Shanty
Richard Hanania’s physiognomy confuses me.
He simultaneously looks like a pedophile and a child that he molested




https://fixupx.com/tombelaviv_/status/1875625900139802933
Tom Bel Aviv⚡️⚡️🔻 (@tombelaviv_)
White guys have no reason to give a fuck about American competitiveness.




https://fixupx.com/tombelaviv_/status/1874194757226029399
Tom Bel Aviv (@tombelaviv_)
A typical example of Musk's "ingenuity." The Robovan (Re-bō-vin), a neomodernistic bullshit city bus which seats fewer people than a bus, yet is being pitched as a solution to traffic and congestion. A non-solution that exists purely due to media hype.


Forward from: Morrakiu
IMPORTANT THINGS ARE HAPPENING ON X


It's highly frustrating to be banned from twitter in the midst of a debate where the opponent is making laughable and specious claims, but can rely on censorship to pull their fat out of the fire. Technically, you are not even allowed to argue the other side of the holocaust on twitter, something that fabulists and frauds dine out on.

At issue this time was an account who asserted that deniers cannot evince an alternative story to the gassing narrative, therefore the gassing narrative must be accepted by default. This is absurd. Not only is this logically just wrong, but there is a readily available alternative narrative and ample evidence.

Limiting things to Auschwitz for the sake of argument, literally all the existing documentary and physical evidence at Auschwitz-Birkenau supports an alternative narrative to the gassing of Jews. The alleged gas chambers were labeled as morgues in the construction documents and blueprints, of which there are many. Gas chambers are not mentioned anywhere. The gas chambers could not have possible worked as described, and key components of the gassing device, like the holes in the roof and mesh columns, do not exist and there is no evidence they ever did. There is no chemical residue of the poison gas, which would be present if the gas was used in large quantities in these spaces. So the case is proven, they could not have been gas chambers. The book is closed on that.

This means that we simply accept the documents and physical evidence for what they are and do not try to impose secret codes, telepathic commands, conspiracies and disappearing bodies on top of them. There is your alternative narrative staring you in the face. It's just all the evidence that has been lied about and misconstrued for all these years. It simply tells a different story than the bizarre gassing conspiracy.

As far as the question of "where did the jews go then" this is more of a rhetorical strategy than a genuine question. it is meant to switch the burden of proof and put the fabulist in the position of being able to deconstruct speculation. Again, there is ample evidence of Jews being shipped to various camps and many of them left for the USA, USSR and occupied Palestine. There is no need for some complex or elaborate theory. But answering this question must start from the point that there were no gassings, because that tale has been decisively disproven.

https://t.me/holocaustclaims/1129




Forward from: Middle East Spectator – MES
— ❗️🇮🇱/🇾🇪 NEW: The IDF has declared military censorship on the missile launch, which likely means at least one of the two missile was not intercepted

Ben Gurion International Airport has temporarily halted all civilian flights leaving from or landing in Tel Aviv.

@Middle_East_Spectator




America has always been about this shit since the beginning.


The IDF aired old footage of Hamas planting an IED 45 meters away from the Indonesian hospital in Gaza. They claim that this justifies their assertion that hospitals are really terror locations and justifies their burning down of Kamal Adwan hospital and the kidnapping of all its staff last week.

This is bullshit. The IED was obviously a legitimate defensive tactic given that the IDF regularly attacks hospitals. No one really takes these claims seriously. Within israel, and to the Palestinians the messaging around the hospital is very different. They don't pretend they are stopping terror. They make it clear they are simply attacking any means of life in Gaza. They want to simply destroy all hope. The level of monstrous evil that Jews are capable of is really breathtaking.

But the claims don't have to be taken seriously. All Jews need to do is provide enough of an excuse that the US and other powers can deflect the issue and trust the Jewish media will sanitize it or else simply erase the incident from collective memory.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/soldier-killed-in-northern-gaza-idf-airs-clip-of-hamas-planting-bombs-near-hospital/


Banned again.




American public television is running puff propaganda pieces for ISIS fighters as they carry out targeted sectarian killings in Syria.

https://t.me/stayfreeworld/37848

20 last posts shown.