Divine_Hiddenness_and_Human_Sin_The_Noet-1.pdf
Divine Hiddenness and Human Sin: The Noetic Effect of Sin
Abstract:
This paper examines the relationship between human sin and divine hiddenness, drawing on views that are widely acknowledged within the Reformed tradition. It argues, first, that according to these views there is no inculpable nonbelief, and thus, second, that a crucial premise in the atheistic argument from divine hiddenness is untenable. The overarching question here is: If there is a sensus divinitatis, is it possible to be an inculpable nonbeliever? To answer this question, the cognitive effects of sin on our sensus divinitatis as a faculty of producing basic beliefs about God will be assessed. I conclude that the premise which many find plausible—that there is
inculpable nonbelief—is in fact controversial and dubious.
Keywords:
inculpable nonbelief, Schellenberg, Calvin, sensus divinitatis
Abstract:
This paper examines the relationship between human sin and divine hiddenness, drawing on views that are widely acknowledged within the Reformed tradition. It argues, first, that according to these views there is no inculpable nonbelief, and thus, second, that a crucial premise in the atheistic argument from divine hiddenness is untenable. The overarching question here is: If there is a sensus divinitatis, is it possible to be an inculpable nonbeliever? To answer this question, the cognitive effects of sin on our sensus divinitatis as a faculty of producing basic beliefs about God will be assessed. I conclude that the premise which many find plausible—that there is
inculpable nonbelief—is in fact controversial and dubious.
Keywords:
inculpable nonbelief, Schellenberg, Calvin, sensus divinitatis