Example of finance discrimination inside the same country ...
Lugano 18765/2 = 9.4k (+0.6k)
Regensdorf 17.2/2 = 8.6k (+1.1k) with 2 kids 3J 3J 6.2 K 15J 15J same ... 5K with 3 kids 7.4k with 1 kid
Zug 7.3/2 = 3.6k (+ 0.3k)
Geneve 23.6/2 = 11.8k (+0.4k)
Just think about this example ... This is simply DISCRIMINATION! and don't we take the excuse "because wage or costs are different" which is just bullshit! It's the same discrimination against women!
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/384
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/181
Not only related to being single or in couple, but even just because you live in a poor region like 🇮🇹, you need to pay MORE than a region like 🇩🇪 ... MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL!
More about this on https://t.me/BenShapiroBullshit/86
Related posts
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/12
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/113
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/93
related to this, is a SHAME rich people need to pay less now, meanwhile poor people more ...!
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/106
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/413
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/393
Lugano 18765/2 = 9.4k (+0.6k)
Regensdorf 17.2/2 = 8.6k (+1.1k) with 2 kids 3J 3J 6.2 K 15J 15J same ... 5K with 3 kids 7.4k with 1 kid
Zug 7.3/2 = 3.6k (+ 0.3k)
Geneve 23.6/2 = 11.8k (+0.4k)
Just think about this example ... This is simply DISCRIMINATION! and don't we take the excuse "because wage or costs are different" which is just bullshit! It's the same discrimination against women!
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/384
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/181
Not only related to being single or in couple, but even just because you live in a poor region like 🇮🇹, you need to pay MORE than a region like 🇩🇪 ... MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL!
More about this on https://t.me/BenShapiroBullshit/86
Related posts
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/12
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/113
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/93
related to this, is a SHAME rich people need to pay less now, meanwhile poor people more ...!
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/106
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/413
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/393