I think there is a middle ground to be had between AF and the no political solution types. When it comes down to it, we all want the same thing (most of us at least) the only real difference is the way we go about achieving our goals. AF believes that we should utilize the current channels and power structure to infiltrate and work within the government and business to forward a Christian ideology. The no political solution types are of the opinion that the AF ideas won’t work due to the corruption/ gatekeeping that the elites use to maintain control. They would rather build their own power structure, usually in the form of self sufficiency and separation from the system.
I do not believe that the idea and methods are mutually exclusive, and in fact I believe that with the right leadership, both parties can work together and we can have a multi-level attack on the system. There is no reason for the lack of cooperation other than stubbornness and the belief that the wignats are feds and the AF people are grifters.
I know lots of people who would agree with the other if they sat down and had a conversation but they are too preoccupied with other things to reach a middle ground. They’re is nothing wrong with preparing for a breakdown of society and there is nothing wrong with trying to use existing political methods in order to achieve a goal.
In order for this to happen we need to dispel the rumors and accusations hurled by both sides. The idea that every AF person is a grifter or controlled opposition is bull. It’s the easiest and most secure way for young men with a lot to lose to get involved. Not everyone has the ability to simply drop out of society or incur the punishments we know the system is capable of executing. To have someone play within the rules and still try to make positive change is a good thing. The only reason one would be a grifter is if they countersignal you on key points. (Israel, JQ, The Church, white identity, Christian nationalism, safe and legal activism) Unless they are cringe on all of the above points, don’t assume the worst.
Equally important is the AF reaction to wignats and no political solution people. The idea that all of them are feds is also not true. Any person that you meet irl will 99% not be a fed, glowies only live on Twitter. It’s important to be careful of people who advocate for violence and illegal activities, they are almost certainly feds. If there are people who promote activism and preparation in a way that won’t get you thrown in jail that’s a good thing. The possibility of societal collapse is real, and political prospects are ever dwindling. If someone wants to prepare for that, then good for them.
I do not believe that the idea and methods are mutually exclusive, and in fact I believe that with the right leadership, both parties can work together and we can have a multi-level attack on the system. There is no reason for the lack of cooperation other than stubbornness and the belief that the wignats are feds and the AF people are grifters.
I know lots of people who would agree with the other if they sat down and had a conversation but they are too preoccupied with other things to reach a middle ground. They’re is nothing wrong with preparing for a breakdown of society and there is nothing wrong with trying to use existing political methods in order to achieve a goal.
In order for this to happen we need to dispel the rumors and accusations hurled by both sides. The idea that every AF person is a grifter or controlled opposition is bull. It’s the easiest and most secure way for young men with a lot to lose to get involved. Not everyone has the ability to simply drop out of society or incur the punishments we know the system is capable of executing. To have someone play within the rules and still try to make positive change is a good thing. The only reason one would be a grifter is if they countersignal you on key points. (Israel, JQ, The Church, white identity, Christian nationalism, safe and legal activism) Unless they are cringe on all of the above points, don’t assume the worst.
Equally important is the AF reaction to wignats and no political solution people. The idea that all of them are feds is also not true. Any person that you meet irl will 99% not be a fed, glowies only live on Twitter. It’s important to be careful of people who advocate for violence and illegal activities, they are almost certainly feds. If there are people who promote activism and preparation in a way that won’t get you thrown in jail that’s a good thing. The possibility of societal collapse is real, and political prospects are ever dwindling. If someone wants to prepare for that, then good for them.