Бесплатные уроки от TGStat Academy

С 1 по 10 января выкладываем мини-уроки в канале!

Курс по Telegram от TGStat Academy

Как сделать свой канал прибыльным с нуля?

Кот научит как «ловить рыбу»

Видение, конкретика, неожиданные подходы.

Статистика Избранное

Race Realism Channel

@racerealismchannel

Гео и язык канала: Весь мир, Английский

Категория: Блоги

Infographics, studies, data, biological anthropology, population genetics, etc.

Связанные каналы | Похожие каналы

Гео и язык канала

Весь мир, Английский

Категория

Блоги

Статистика

Избранное

Фильтр публикаций

Скрывать удаленные

Скрывать репосты

Race Realism Channel

4 Jan, 02:25

2.5k 2 75

Race Realism Channel

3 Jan, 20:59

Ethnic breakdown of grooming gangs in Britain:

CEOP (Out of Mind, Out of Sight, 2011):
- Asians were 11.5 times more likely to engage in group child sexual exploitation than Whites

Berelowitz (I thought I was the only one, 2012):
- Perpetrators were 35% White (of which only 11% were British), 28% Asian and Middle Eastern, 16% Black.
- Asians & Middle Easterners were 10 times more likely to commit group CSE than Whites, while Blacks were 13.4 times more likely.

CEOP (Threat Assessment of Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, 2013):
- 75% of perpetrators were Asian, implying Asians are 40 times more likely to commit grooming gang crimes than non-Asians.

Berelowitz (If it's not better, it's not the end, 2015):
- Asians and Blacks were 4.2 and 11.8 times more likely to engage in grooming gang crimes than Whites.
- Asians and Blacks were 2.13 and 4 times more likely to engage in all forms of child sexual exploitation than Whites.

Skidmore (Organised crime and child sexual exploitation in local communities, 2016):
- Those from minority ethnic backgrounds were over-represented

Rafiq & Adil (Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation: Dissecting "Grooming Gangs," 2017):
- Of 264 grooming gang convictions, 84% were Asian, 8% Black, 7% White, 1% unknown.

Bhatti-Sinclair (Group Localised Child Sexual Exploitation Offenders: Who and Why? 2020):
- Between 1997 and 2017, 83% of those prosecuted for grooming gang crimes were Muslims
- 1 in 2,200 of the male Muslims in England and Wales over the age of 16 have been prosecuted for GLCSE

5.8k 2 206

Race Realism Channel

1 Jan, 03:09

Estimated number of people with an IQ equal to or greater than 100, 115, and 130 in the USA and India.

America contains 16 times more people with ≥130 IQ than India, despite India's massive population advantage.

The idea that any Western country requires third world migrants to perform high skilled work is ludicrous.

Graphs produced by Noah Hirsch on X.

20.4k 5 845

Race Realism Channel

29 Dec 2024, 21:56

Immigrants work less and take more.

14.8k 7 377

Race Realism Channel

29 Dec 2024, 02:05

In the US, Whites consider being American more important than being White, while non-Whites consider their respective races more important than being American.

https://hereticalinsights.substack.com/p/modern-immigration-the-road-to-ruin

12.1k 5 321

Race Realism Channel

5 Dec 2024, 21:20

"A new study published by researchers at London's Natural History Museum and Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven has reinforced the claim that Neanderthals and modern-day humans (Homo sapiens) must be classed as separate species in order to best track our evolutionary history."

"The study claims that if interbreeding was the final word in determining species status, then hundreds of distinct species of mammals and birds today would have their separate species status revoked and that without recognizing patterns in evolution and subsequent categorization, the question of when a species first appeared becomes more intractable."

Left-wing activist academics have spent decades arguing that Neanderthals were merely a subspecies of Homo sapiens — a transparent distortion of human taxonomy to support their claim that no human subspecies (races) exist today. Nice to see some academic pushback against this nonsense.

https://phys.org/news/2024-12-neanderthals-modern-humans-classed-species.html

22.6k 3 562

Race Realism Channel

24 Nov 2024, 22:16

Asians have larger family sizes than Whites, which will obviously skew household income results. This data is almost 10 years old (couldn't find anything more recent) and doesn't account for cohabitation of non-related peoples.

Addendum to this post.

17.4k 2 128

Race Realism Channel

24 Nov 2024, 21:58

Data in the first image is often used in defense of legal migration, particularly from Asia. Some counter points:

- These migrants are generally the highest achieving representatives of their respective ethnic groups.

- These demographics near exclusively inhabit affluent urban areas; comparing them to Whites, who are comparatively far more rural, is disingenuous.

- When Whites are subdivided by ethnic ancestry, many groups have significantly higher household incomes (2022 census data).

- Household income is not individual per capita income. I couldn't find recent data for per capita income by ethnic ancestry, but even when Whites are grouped together, we still have higher per capita income than multiple non-White ethnic groups whose household incomes are higher than Whites'.

15.1k 4 213

Race Realism Channel

22 Nov 2024, 03:57

Cape Verde: 400 miles west of Senegal. Uninhabited until it was settled by the Portuguese in the 15th century.

Madagascar: 250 miles east of Mozambique. Uninhabited until it was settled by Indonesians between 350 BC and 550 AD.

Sao Tome and Principe: 155 and 140 miles west of Gabon. Uninhabited until they were settled by the Portuguese in the 16th century.

14.1k 2 247

Race Realism Channel

11 Nov 2024, 01:43

Cubans are the only Hispanic demographic that voted majority Trump in 2024. Every other Hispanic demographic voted ~55-65% Harris.

Of the ~70 million Hispanics in America, less than 3 million are Cuban. Mexicans, who make up ~60% of Hispanics in America, voted 62% Harris.

Contrary to cuckservative claims, Hispanics are still a huge problem demographic and will likely vote left for generations to come — perhaps indefinitely, judging by most Latin American countries.

29.5k 8 471

Race Realism Channel

10 Nov 2024, 23:28

Approximate ethnic breakdown of major Trump and Harris donors.

Major Trump donors:
73.1% White
19.2% Jewish
3.8% Lebanese
3.8% White + Indian

Major Harris donors:
64.3% Jewish
28.6% White
3.6% Indian
3.6% White + Jewish

Research by True Discipline on X using these two sources:
https://archive.ph/UP3in
https://archive.is/RMhvx

27.8k 11 743

Race Realism Channel

7 Nov 2024, 03:25

NBC's 2024 exit polls.

Despite Trump's focus on mass deportation, he did surprisingly well with minorities, other than Blacks and Jews.

This should go without saying, but don't take these poll results as gospel.

(Source)

20.6k 4 283

Race Realism Channel

3 Nov 2024, 00:51

"It's common knowledge that Asian science is full of fraud. Less common knowledge is that Asian scientists in the US also commit a lot of fraud vs their white peers. For instance, as of 2022 19/29 researchers sanctioned by the ORI are of Asian origin."

"This reflects poorly on university plans to attract Asian STEM talent to replace their white faculty. Ability isn't enough - you also need honesty."

"source: https://ori.hhs.gov/content/case_summary"

(via Arctotherium on X)

23.4k 8 591

Race Realism Channel

26 Oct 2024, 23:15

Fiscal impact by race in the US:

Only Whites and Asians make net positive contributions. Blacks and Hispanics collectively make a colossal $934 billion net negative contribution.

Currently, Asians who migrate to America are of higher socioeconomic status and above average intelligence in their respective homelands. However, if Asians were to mass migrate, they would likely make a net negative contribution. The average IQ of China is approximately 100, while the average IQ of India is around 76 (see: Most Accurate National IQs Possible).

Source: Fiscal Impact by Race in 2022 by Alden Whitfeld (follow him on X here)

37.6k 14 868

Race Realism Channel

25 Oct 2024, 19:33

Samples from The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans are now available.

The paper claimed that Proto-Indo-Europeans received their Neolithic Anatolian ancestry via Neolithic Armenians, rather than Neolithic Europeans, but that doesn't seem to be the case for the Yamnaya. Early European Farmers of the neighboring Trypillia Culture are a likely source.

The Sredy Stog people did have minor ancestry from Neolithic Armenians, varying by subpopulation, but they too had Early European Farmer ancestry.

I wonder if the authors were trying to appease Anatolian Hypothesis believers? Possibly attempting to save face after the terrible Southern Arc paper by linking the two theories? Either way, it's obvious that the Indo-European languages originated in Europe.

17.4k 4 218

Показано 15 последних публикаций.

12 410

подписчиков

Статистика канала

Популярное в канале

"A new study published by researchers at London's Natural History Museum and Institute of Philoso...

Estimated number of people with an IQ equal to or greater than 100, 115, and 130 in the USA and I...

In the US, Whites consider being American more important than being White, while non-Whites consi...

Immigrants work less and take more.