Cannibalistic homicides were exceedingly rare, and often sex-related.
Would you keep alive a cannibalist, who first rapes a woman, then she gets killed to prepare a delicious lunch, maybe later he eats the vagina as snack?
Reason why the death sentence should come back and in case be inactive, but still ready to use it if needed, for similar cases, if people in europe don't agree with a sentence to death for some killers / rapers with serious proofs.
We know that here in Europe people are more against that, especially related to religious aspects and the fear to kill an innocent, mixed with the bullshit Amnesty is sharing.
Would you keep alive a cannibalist, who first rapes a woman, then she gets killed to prepare a delicious lunch, maybe later he eats the vagina as snack?
Reason why the death sentence should come back and in case be inactive, but still ready to use it if needed, for similar cases, if people in europe don't agree with a sentence to death for some killers / rapers with serious proofs.
We know that here in Europe people are more against that, especially related to religious aspects and the fear to kill an innocent, mixed with the bullshit Amnesty is sharing.