Let we check now source 7 for this statement. Ops sorry, we already did before, when we checked some other studies ... it's a book (= not a real valid scientific source!!!)
Check previous post https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/220 (in few words "30-40% of teenage girls and older women and men don’t meet the RDA for protein")
But let we check a bit more the "The Dietitian's Guide to Vegetarian Diets: Issues and Applications":
They write "Intake decreased to 91 to 66+/- 17 g pro day in elderly. 8.6% were below requirement" The requirement without vegan nutrition is at least 1.2 g in elderly (increased). Means that they should weight 55kg to meet such requirement, without considering those who consumed 49 g protein pro day. Then we need to consider 10-20% more need due to protein quality, more need for clinical nutrition. So how the hell can we call it "typically exceeed". Plus what you mean with "typically". Each word can be interpreted in so many ways! and "typically for which country? which culture? which age? which patient? which ...?"
But let we check the cited paper (2003-2004): men 73.4 +/- 18 women 58.6 +/- 14.7 = 61 kg and 48 kg. Later they write 1 g/kg +/- 0.3.
Let we check the whole pdf, not just the 4 pages summary: "Weight Comment: Missing in 9264 and Clothing in 338 ..."
Let we check a 🇨🇭 paper by University of Zurich published about the NHANES, where data is showed much easier and faster: 73% had BMI over 25 kg/m2 = they weight more, so if this 1 g (which is not enough for elderly....) is correct, it's still a question ...
Back to the book:
They even write "Diets in different geographic regions differ markedly in their percentage of protein derived from plant and animal sources"! This is important to not forget = we cannot use USA data with other countries, it's like saying animal physiology is = to human physiology ...
Check previous post https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/220 (in few words "30-40% of teenage girls and older women and men don’t meet the RDA for protein")
But let we check a bit more the "The Dietitian's Guide to Vegetarian Diets: Issues and Applications":
They write "Intake decreased to 91 to 66+/- 17 g pro day in elderly. 8.6% were below requirement" The requirement without vegan nutrition is at least 1.2 g in elderly (increased). Means that they should weight 55kg to meet such requirement, without considering those who consumed 49 g protein pro day. Then we need to consider 10-20% more need due to protein quality, more need for clinical nutrition. So how the hell can we call it "typically exceeed". Plus what you mean with "typically". Each word can be interpreted in so many ways! and "typically for which country? which culture? which age? which patient? which ...?"
But let we check the cited paper (2003-2004): men 73.4 +/- 18 women 58.6 +/- 14.7 = 61 kg and 48 kg. Later they write 1 g/kg +/- 0.3.
Let we check the whole pdf, not just the 4 pages summary: "Weight Comment: Missing in 9264 and Clothing in 338 ..."
Let we check a 🇨🇭 paper by University of Zurich published about the NHANES, where data is showed much easier and faster: 73% had BMI over 25 kg/m2 = they weight more, so if this 1 g (which is not enough for elderly....) is correct, it's still a question ...
Back to the book:
They even write "Diets in different geographic regions differ markedly in their percentage of protein derived from plant and animal sources"! This is important to not forget = we cannot use USA data with other countries, it's like saying animal physiology is = to human physiology ...