Differences between gnoseological types of world understanding are in its working methods.
See, religious one is working by faith. You just believe in things you told. Simple example:
- "Johnny, your mum is stupid c*nt"
- "M'kay, but I don't believe you. I need much bigger authority, to force me
-" Ohh, one Jewish guy told me that there's a second one, who's 33 year old homeless man making wonders, and he forced me to send you this message"
-" Oh, thanks, also I’ve got anal pain, can your friend fix it?"
Stupid, isn't it? Hope we are done with it once and forever.
Scientific one: you have to feel the truth - to see it, to hear it, to touch it, to count it. For instance, to put it in a table.
-"I need portion of "H", can you lend me any money?"
-"It could be a favour for me, but i don't have anything"
-" Oh, really? Let me check it".
Yeah, of course you will find the truth, which you can beat from your “partner” whatever it, will be: girlfriend, fiction book, or researching tree tops for leaves falling down percent.
Philosophical, logical one (based on three types of logic, see next)
- "Dad, I hate my teacher, I want to kill her, but mom said that it's wrong, and it's a bad decision."
- "You know, son, questions of morality ain't got any sense, so, it's only your decision. Test your luck!"
Which one the best? Hm, I don't know, more interesting: which one is worst and what happened with two out of three existed before?
P.S. There are tons of good varieties of the philosophical method, next.
See, religious one is working by faith. You just believe in things you told. Simple example:
- "Johnny, your mum is stupid c*nt"
- "M'kay, but I don't believe you. I need much bigger authority, to force me
-" Ohh, one Jewish guy told me that there's a second one, who's 33 year old homeless man making wonders, and he forced me to send you this message"
-" Oh, thanks, also I’ve got anal pain, can your friend fix it?"
Stupid, isn't it? Hope we are done with it once and forever.
Scientific one: you have to feel the truth - to see it, to hear it, to touch it, to count it. For instance, to put it in a table.
-"I need portion of "H", can you lend me any money?"
-"It could be a favour for me, but i don't have anything"
-" Oh, really? Let me check it".
Yeah, of course you will find the truth, which you can beat from your “partner” whatever it, will be: girlfriend, fiction book, or researching tree tops for leaves falling down percent.
Philosophical, logical one (based on three types of logic, see next)
- "Dad, I hate my teacher, I want to kill her, but mom said that it's wrong, and it's a bad decision."
- "You know, son, questions of morality ain't got any sense, so, it's only your decision. Test your luck!"
Which one the best? Hm, I don't know, more interesting: which one is worst and what happened with two out of three existed before?
P.S. There are tons of good varieties of the philosophical method, next.