What is the difference between a death penalty applied for animal cruelty
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/12
to
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/20
and a death penalty applied to right wing terrorists, pedo, cannibalism and similar things?
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Well, here is the main point of Amnesty! Amnesty is always looking just deterrent by giving a shit to RECIVIDISM / PRISON ESCAPES
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance
when in reality for the second example both are important, but recidivism has much more priority!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/39
and the fact that there is no + or - science against or pro related to this topic! which again is not really important for humans, because it depends from MANY factors!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/375
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/384
So deterrent is especially important for "illegal animal cruelty"
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/364
less for wildlife crimes, because such things can be done even after prison release! You don't need a business to do that ....
A person can killing 100 people for hate ... and once released or escaped he can kill other 100 for hate again ...
A person doing animal cruelty for money, well is marked by our governments after the crime. So you simply disable the possibility to be active in similar business and you could fix in part the issue ... Where is the goal of a death penalty? Exactly to try reduce the amount of new crimes, if people know exactly they get death penalty once the government discover that!
This means you get a death penalty for making money with illegal torture! Again, this would probably NOT fix wildlife crimes
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/86
Is this science? NOPE! because a) science cannot answer similar questions b) almost no one or no one is applying death penalty for mass killed animals!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
Exactly like almost no one is talking about all killed animals during the war
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/12
to
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/20
and a death penalty applied to right wing terrorists, pedo, cannibalism and similar things?
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Well, here is the main point of Amnesty! Amnesty is always looking just deterrent by giving a shit to RECIVIDISM / PRISON ESCAPES
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance
when in reality for the second example both are important, but recidivism has much more priority!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/39
and the fact that there is no + or - science against or pro related to this topic! which again is not really important for humans, because it depends from MANY factors!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/375
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/384
So deterrent is especially important for "illegal animal cruelty"
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/364
less for wildlife crimes, because such things can be done even after prison release! You don't need a business to do that ....
A person can killing 100 people for hate ... and once released or escaped he can kill other 100 for hate again ...
A person doing animal cruelty for money, well is marked by our governments after the crime. So you simply disable the possibility to be active in similar business and you could fix in part the issue ... Where is the goal of a death penalty? Exactly to try reduce the amount of new crimes, if people know exactly they get death penalty once the government discover that!
This means you get a death penalty for making money with illegal torture! Again, this would probably NOT fix wildlife crimes
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/86
Is this science? NOPE! because a) science cannot answer similar questions b) almost no one or no one is applying death penalty for mass killed animals!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
Exactly like almost no one is talking about all killed animals during the war