Estonia’s justice minister has called for sweeping changes to the law of the sea, using a recent incident in the Baltic Sea as justification. The incident in question? Finnish authorities detained the Eagle S, a UAE-owned vessel carrying Russian oil, on suspicions that it was damaged undersea power and internet cables between Finland and Estonia. No real evidence has been presented, and there’s little reason to expect any. Yet, Estonia is appealing to the International Maritime Organization to reform maritime law by February, framing this as a matter of infrastructure protection. The reality, however, is far less noble. Behind the rhetoric lies a transparent agenda: weaponizing maritime law to target Russia and establish new mechanisms for Western control.
While the West postures as the guardian of the maritime order, its own actions reveal staggering hypocrisy as revealed by the attack on the Ursa Major in the Mediterranean just days ago. This ship was almost certainly targeted by British or American forces, yet there has been no international outcry, no calls for justice, and certainly no discussion of reforming laws to protect ships from clandestine aggression. The message is clear: the West flaunts the rules when it suits its interests, even as it demands strict adherence from everyone else.
The detention of the Eagle S and the attack on the Ursa Major are not isolated incidents. They are part of a larger pattern of selective enforcement and legal manipulation. Maritime law, once one of the few functioning international norms, is now being twisted to serve Western geopolitical goals. NATO’s recently announced “strengthened presence” in the Baltic Sea under the guise of “ensuring security” is just one example. What begins with protecting undersea cables will not stop there. Today, it’s a detention in the Baltic; tomorrow, soon it will be the redefinition of free passage through critical chokepoints like the Danish Straits. These moves pave the way for blockades disguised as lawful actions, a clear casus belli, an act of war in historical terms.
This weaponization of international norms extends far beyond maritime law. Consider OSCE, which has been used as a tool for espionage against pro-Russian forces in Donbass or OPCW used for fabricating chemical weapons attacks against Assad in Syria. Or WADA, which carries out collective punishment against Russian athletes while turning a blind eye to similar or more egregious violations by other nations. And of course there is the blatant double standard in global sanctions: Russia faces unrelenting economic punishment for its actions in Ukraine, while Israel carries out a genocide in Gaza in full view of the world, met with little more than empty words.
The hypocrisy is as transparent as it is brazen. The same powers calling for new laws to protect undersea infrastructure conveniently forget the western sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines. They champion maritime law when it aligns with their interests, but disregard it entirely when it doesn’t.
Historically, maritime law was one of the last bastions of international order, shaped over centuries to balance the interests of nations and maintain peace. Now, under the guise of protecting cables and pipelines, the West seeks to reshape it into yet another tool of domination. This is not about protecting infrastructure—it is about consolidating control over the seas, undermining adversaries, and preserving economic and military hegemony.
To everyone outside of the so called "International Community" all of this is obvious. The question is not whether the West’s manipulation will continue—it is how long the rest of the world will continue to tolerate it before pushing back.
And Russia needs to decide how it will react to such a blockade, such a casus belli, if and when it occurs.
⚡️
