ViroLIEgy

Do Antibodies Equal Protection? They Don’t Know.

How many antibodies equals protection/immunity? If you are vaccinated but have low or no detectable antibodies, did the vaccine not work? What about if you are vaccinated and still got sick despite high levels of antibodies? If you have too many antibodies, does that mean you have an autoimmune disease due to an overactive immune system? If you have too few antibodies, do you have a weakened immune system?

The answer to all of these questions: THEY DON’T KNOW.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/06/do-antibodies-equal-protection-they-dont-know/

The Infectious Myth Busted Part 3: HIV Transmission Rare or Non-Existent?

HIV is supposedly a deadly and contagious sexually transmitted disease. However, what does it say about HIV when a 10-year study found no transmission between discordant couples having unprotected sex? How about the CDC acknowledging rare to non-existent transmission among patients and healthcare workers accidentally pricked by "infected" needles? What if the discoverers of HIV do not believe their "virus" causes AIDS and it can be cured through proper nutrition? Sounds like the recipe for another infectious myth being busted.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/05/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-3-hiv-transmission-rare-or-non-existent/

The Infectious Myth Busted Part 2: How are “Viruses” Transmitted? They don’t know.

When you look at the evidence (or lack thereof) throughout the last century, you find that not only has it been regularly shown that “viruses” can not be transmitted from human-to-human, virologists clearly have no idea how “viruses” are transmitted at all. Presented in this post are a few examples over the last century which showcase the lack of evidence and knowledge throughout virology.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/04/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-2-how-are-viruses-transmitted-they-dont-know/

When the evidence doesn't fit your narrative, what do you do?

Oh, that's right. Continue to move the goalposts...

HEADLINE: Virus surge hits New England despite high vaccination rates

HIGHLIGHTS:

"DESPITE HAVING THE HIGHEST VACCINATION RATES IN THE COUNTRY, there are constant reminders for most New England states of just how vicious the delta variant of COVID-19 is."

"According to statistics from The Associated Press, THE FIVE STATES WITH THE HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF A FULLY VACCINATED POPULATION ARE ALL IN NEW ENGLAND, with Vermont leading, followed by Connecticut, Maine, Rhode Island and Massachusetts. New Hampshire is 10th.

According to the AP data, FULL VACCINATION RATES ACROSS THE SIX NEW ENGLAND STATES RANGE FROM A HIGH OF 69.4% IN VERMONT TO 61.5% IN NEW HAMPSHIRE.

Despite the relatively high vaccination rates — the U.S. as a whole is averaging 55.5% — there are still hundreds of thousands of people across the region who, for one reason or another, remain unvaccinated and vulnerable to infection.

NOW, A RHODE ISLAND OFFICIAL SAID HE DIDN'T THINK THE 70% VACCINATION GOAL, ONCE TOUTED AS THE LEVEL THAT WOULD HELP END THE PANDEMIC IN THE STATE, IS ENOUGH.

“What we've learned with delta and looking beyond delta, is because that's where our focus is as well, to really reach those levels of vaccination, to give you that true population level protection, YOU NEED TO BE IN EXCESS OF 90%,” said Tom McCarthy, the executive director of the Rhode Island Department of Health COVID Response Unit.

Officials throughout New England CONTINUE TO PUSH THE UNVACCINATED TO GET THE SHOTS AS WELL AS BOLSTER VACCINE MANDATES."

"Case counts in Vermont, WHICH HAS CONTINUALLY BOASTED ABOUT HIGH VACCINATION AND LOW HOSPITALIZATION AND DEATH RATES, ARE THE HIGHEST DURING THE PANDEMIC. Hospitalizations are approaching the pandemic peak from last winter and SEPTEMBER WAS VERMONT'S SECOND-DEADLIEST MONTH DURING THE PANDEMIC."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/delta-tearing-states-despite-high-115328590.html

"The vaccination goal needs to be 70%...no, maybe 90%...aw hell, let's make it 110%! It's not like anyone is paying attention!"

Give them an inch and they will take a mile.

The Infectious Myth Busted Part 1: The Rosenau Spanish Flu Experiments (1918)

During the 1918 Spanish Flu, which is considered to be the most contagious “virus” of all time, researchers for the Public Health Service and the U.S. Navy tried to determine what caused the flu and how infectious it truly was. However, the results of their experiments proved that the flu is not infectious at all.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/03/the-infectious-myth-busted-part-1-the-rosenau-spanish-flu-experiments-1918/

“Viral” Load of Crap

"Viral" load is a measure used to try and claim how much "virus" is present in someone as well as to determine the severity of disease. It is estimated off of PCR Cycle Threshold (Ct) Values. The problem, however, is that "viral" loads have been shown to be inaccurate and vary widely, Ct values used to estimate them are not standardized and are influenced by numerous variables outside of the quantity of RNA, and "viral" loads have no known correlation to disease severity/infectivity. As a measurement, "viral" load is meaningless and belongs in the toilet with the rest of virology.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/10/01/viral-load-of-crap/

PCR and the Prevalence Problem

Without properly purified/isolated “virus,” PCR accuracy can not be confirmed. Without PCR, “Covid-19” cases cannot be confirmed and prevalence is unknown. Without knowing disease prevalence, PCR accuracy is unknown. See the problem here?

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/30/pcr-and-the-prevalence-problem/

The IDSA and AMP Joint Statement Destroying PCR Tests

This statement not only destroys the use of PCR as a "diagnostic" tool due to the unreliability of the Ct values and their complete and utter meaninglessness, it also destroys the use of cell cultures as a proxy for replication competent "virus" as there is no correlation between cell culture positivity and infectiousness. This statement is a great double whammy against the pseudoscience that is virology.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/29/the-idsa-and-amp-joint-statement-destroying-pcr-tests/

PCR Ct Values: Arbitrary & Meaningless

If you want to understand why we are currently in a Testing Pandemic beyond the fact that "SARS-COV-2" has never been purified/isolated, look no further than the PCR test. If you assume the results from these tests have any value or meaning whatsoever, you'd be wrong. They rely on random Cycle Threshold Values to determine one as positive or negative. The problem, however, is that these Ct Values are not standardized across tests, are determined by the manufacturers of each test, and the CDC doesn't know what Ct Value (if any) corresponds to whether one is "infectious" or not. In other words, the tests are absolutely meaningless.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/28/pcr-ct-values-arbitrary-meaningless/

Enders Measles Paper (1954)

This paper from 1954 set up the fraudulent cell culture method and the indirect evidence used to claim "isolation" of "viruses" today. It is cited by many as the definitive "virus isolation" paper. However, did Enders actually isolate a measles "virus?" Was the CPE he observed actually caused by a "virus?" Did Enders even believe in his own evidence and conclusions?

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/27/enders-measles-paper-1954/

Where is the “SARS-COV-2” Animal Model???

With numerous animals supposedly testing positive for "SARS-COV-2" and the warnings about humans infecting their pets, one would think it should be easy for virology to come up with at least one animal that experiences the same symptoms of disease as humans in order to establish an animal model to accurately study the "virus." However, this is not the case and there still is no proof the toxic cell-culture goo can create the same disease, let alone be considered pathogenic.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/25/where-is-the-sars-cov-2-animal-model/

Lack of “SARS-COV-2” Animal Models

What does it say about "SARS-COV-2" when virologists have never recreated the same disease seen in humans in experimental animal models in order to prove pathogenicity? How can anyone continue to take this hoax seriously?

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/24/lack-of-sars-cov-2-animal-models/

Non-Human Primate “SARS-COV-2” Animal Model Study (2020)

One of the requirements for proving a "virus" exists and causes disease is to recreate the same disease in humans in experiments on animals. Logically this needs to be done with property purified/isolated particles and the animals should be exposed in a natural way. This is never the case as animals are injected in the throat, eyes, nose, etc. with toxic cell culture supernatant. Sometimes they even genetically alter animals in order to attempt recreating the disease. However, even in the case of "SARS-COV-2," they are yet to find an animal model that can recreate the same disease seen in humans. This NHP study from August 2020 is a good microcosm of the ridiculous methods they use and it also tears down the other available animal models in the process. Without an animal model, there is no proof of pathogenicity of anything.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/23/non-human-primate-sars-cov-2-animal-model-study-2020/

The Purification Problem

Two sources, one from 1975 and another from 2020, further solidify that it is impossible to purify (free from foreign materials, contaminants, pollutants, etc.) particles assumed to be "viruses." Without proper purification/isolation, virology is nothing but pseudoscientific fraud.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/21/the-purification-problem/

Is Complete Purification/Isolation of a “Virus” Even Possible?

In order to know if the particles assumed to be "viruses" exist and can cause disease, they must be purified (free of foreign materials, contaminants, pollutants, etc.) and isolated (separated from everything else). There are certain methods (ultracentrifugation, ultrafiltration, precipitation) which are supposed to be used but are mostly absent in Virology papers. Fortunately, exosome research regularly attempts purification/isolation using these methods. Seeing how exosomes and "viruses" are identical in nearly every way, looking at the methods for one says a lot about the other.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/20/is-complete-purification-isolation-of-a-virus-even-possible/

What Do Virologists Mean by Isolation?

In order to claim isolation of any "virus," virologists needed to change the definition of the word to claim that they accomplished this logical requirement. However, if you have to change the meaning of isolation in order to claim you isolated something, you never did.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/19/what-do-virologists-mean-by-isolation/

Drosten “SARS-COV-2” PCR Paper

If you want to understand the Testing Pandemic we are in, a great place to start is by reading how the Drosten PCR test was created entirely in a computer based off of social media reports without any actual "SARS-COV-2" isolates available. This is the test used most around the world, and just like the CDC test, it is highly inaccurate and generates positive results even with water.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/18/drosten-sars-cov-2-pcr-paper/

CDC “SARS-COV-2” Paper (2020)

In March 2020, the CDC put out their own study detailing the first US case of "SARS-COV-2" from January 22nd, 2020. As with every "virus" paper before it, the CDC utilized the unpurified cell culture method to "isolate" their "virus." However, you will see that there are many other valid reasons to discount this study as well.

https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/17/cdc-sars-cov-2-paper-2020/