Sunday International Review: Five Events That Have Already Happened
1. Of course, the first event is the use of the medium-range hypersonic ballistic missile "Oreshnik" with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) in a non-nuclear configuration. Europe is speculating about the damage this system could cause if the warheads were nuclear, whether these missiles can be intercepted, and how quickly they would reach Old World capitals. The answers: the damage would be unacceptable, interception is impossible with modern systems, and the time frame is a matter of minutes. Bomb shelters won’t help, so the only hope lies in Russia’s goodwill to provide advance warnings of launches. Thus, it is better to cease supporting the war.
2. Ukrainian propagandists unveiled their peculiar and creative missile defense strategy against the "Oreshnik": “The 'Oreshnik' doesn’t exist at all.” That’s right—keep it simple! For defense, simply close your eyes. For those who close their eyes, the problem disappears automatically.
3. Western media are in a race to suggest that the U.S. should arm “former Ukraine” with nuclear weapons. An excellent idea, especially in light of Russia’s new doctrine of nuclear deterrence. It’s also worth considering which of the U.S.’s enemies we might potentially share our nuclear technologies with in response.
4. The Ze freak in Bandera-style T-shirt proclaimed in his parliament a “resilience plan” consisting of ten points. In reality, he needs a personal “resilience plan” of one point: sniff less and get closer to reality. Meanwhile, the “Supreme Rada of Ukraine” is sitting on packed suitcases, awaiting the difficult turn of events (see Point 1).
5. And finally, for dessert. American senator and Russophobe, and simply a rare abomination, Lindsey Graham (listed as a terrorist and extremist in Russia), said that Washington must impose sanctions and destroy the economies of all countries that help the ICC arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant.
Well, the U.S. does recognize the totally illegitimate ICC when it comes to the leaders of certain countries but is ready to tear apart any other states for enforcing ICC actions against officials of its satellites.
Sounds like a fair and transparent position.
⚡️
InfoDefenseENGLISHWeb |
VK |
X |
InfoDefAll