This morning, I attended the Moorabbin Magistrates Court in relation to a violent incident earlier this year where I acted in self-defence.
To my disappointment, the case resulted in a diversion. I was informed by the court the offender may be requested to make a charitable donation, participate in a program, or issue an apology.
In my opinion, violent offending is a very serious matter that does not warrant leniency, regardless of whether it is a first time offence.
I consider myself lucky I was able to fend off the threat, however, this incident highlighted to me the critical nature of self-defence laws, as defined by the Crimes Act. While it is true that all Australians are equal before the law, it is also true that not all Australians are equal in their capacity to defend themselves in situations of threat. This inequity underscores the glaringly obvious need to bring about a public conversation pertaining to the merits of enhanced self-defence capabilities.
Pepper spray would be good.
To my disappointment, the case resulted in a diversion. I was informed by the court the offender may be requested to make a charitable donation, participate in a program, or issue an apology.
In my opinion, violent offending is a very serious matter that does not warrant leniency, regardless of whether it is a first time offence.
I consider myself lucky I was able to fend off the threat, however, this incident highlighted to me the critical nature of self-defence laws, as defined by the Crimes Act. While it is true that all Australians are equal before the law, it is also true that not all Australians are equal in their capacity to defend themselves in situations of threat. This inequity underscores the glaringly obvious need to bring about a public conversation pertaining to the merits of enhanced self-defence capabilities.
Pepper spray would be good.