Woah woah woah woah!
If it's true this woman's husband THREATENED TO KILL HER, like she says in the video, then that absolutely is a FAULT that would allow her to divorce him even without no-fault divorce.
(Again, if any of this is even true, it's just a vid online after all)
You don't have to support abolishing no-fault divorce to understand that threatening your spouse's life IS DEFINITELY A FAULT!
"Well without no-fault divorce, what if someone's husband beats her??"
That's a fault!
Look I'm not even convinced no-fault divorce is the reason divorce rates are higher than the past, but I've seen this argument against abolishing it before and it just doesn't make sense.
If it's true this woman's husband THREATENED TO KILL HER, like she says in the video, then that absolutely is a FAULT that would allow her to divorce him even without no-fault divorce.
(Again, if any of this is even true, it's just a vid online after all)
You don't have to support abolishing no-fault divorce to understand that threatening your spouse's life IS DEFINITELY A FAULT!
"Well without no-fault divorce, what if someone's husband beats her??"
That's a fault!
Look I'm not even convinced no-fault divorce is the reason divorce rates are higher than the past, but I've seen this argument against abolishing it before and it just doesn't make sense.