The Right People Z

In my opinion, the most desirable scenario for the survival of the various white nationalities in Western Europe is for Trump to offer a severe confrontation with the European Union while the conflict in Ukraine continues.
In this dynamic within Europe we will see nationalist and economic forces distancing themselves from the noxious Judeo-American concept of ‘the West’ in favour of a truly native European worldview that necessarily involves rapprochement with Russia if only to gain economic independence.
If Russia is smart (and there are ample signs of this), it will not only support economic realignment as in 2014, but also cultural realignment.

#meta
#nationalism
#autism

> You are Trump's team
> Let's end the war (vote for me)
> President
Whatever

#meta
#History
#nationalism

elon musk retweeting satanyahu

#humor

Within the European Union I see an interesting dynamic.
Trump's aggressive stance could greatly favour the independence of the Union vis-à-vis the USA, as we saw in 2014 with Merkel or in the first term with Trump.
This independence can go in any direction.
I see 3 factions in the European elite:

1 - The pro-war one, characterised mainly by the Eastern European countries.
2 - The pro-peace, and even those who prefer a realignment with Russia for obvious geo-strategic reasons, the biggest exponent being Orban, but many of the mainstream nationalist parties like AfD fall in here, which are making big electoral gains.
3 - The economic faction.
Under the Biden administration, the industrialists had a neutral outlook and did not favour war, but allowed it despite losses.
They are an enemy of Trump (remember the previous trade war), the disappearance of the German car industry, long enemy of the decrepit American industry favours them and especially Elon Musk ...
In case Trump makes his anti-European intentions obvious, this camp will join the pro-peace camp.
Merkel, who was all about economics, was in this camp and this is how mutually beneficial projects came about such as the NordStream II, by a simple arithmetical calculation.

#meta

I can't wait for these two months of excitement over the
"Trump will stop the war"
pass and the disappointing reality, similar to 2017-2021, sets in.
Really boring to read all these people thinking Trump will stop the war.
In my opinion the most favourable stance in this direction is that the American administration will want to limit the losses in Ukraine (I mean on the ground) and therefore they will want to stop it as soon as possible as it seems inevitable that Russia will continue to advance at an ever increasing pace.
On the other hand, once you dig a bit you find that the people elected by Trump and his party, are full of people with the same mentality as the Biden administration of 2022 ‘Russia is a gas station’, well for example At the Republican Convention, the incoming National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, brags about how Trump threatened to bomb the Kremlin.

On the one hand, there is what the United States has to offer, which Russia currently wants.
The Soviet leaders were tremendously stupid, they trusted Jewish-America not to expand NATO, well they signed the pact not to create medium ballistic missiles.
Which Trump himself left in 2019.
Now Russia has a weapon that renders the missile shield in Europe useless, which was one of the pillars of the Judeo-American imperial policy in the European colonies, this is just one example.
The Kremlin, stupid as it may be, will not be that stupid.
In the other direction it is likely that knowing Trump's bluster, it will simply keep escalating, although in general there is little room left for escalation, not only that even in the current format there are not that many supplies to bring to Ukraine and it is already working here to the limit, the extension of supplies depends on the extension of production. There is the factor that people, well, you can't manufacture them, and as is well known Ukraine has problems in this field.

On the other hand, and going back to the idea of ‘cutting losses’, the US (despite what they think) is not going to be able to force Ukraine to make radical decisions even if they wanted to (I have said before, that even if Zelensky agrees, they would soon have a civil war in the country).
And on the other hand there is the European Union in which sometimes they seem to be the ones who want war the most and other days they want peace, so they are a bit of a chaotic variable.
In any case, the most likely option is for things to continue as they have been, with regular NATO arms supplies, with occasional escalations in an effort to wear Russia down as much as possible.

#meta


(images unrelated)

Effectiveness of radar and electronic warfare (EW) in combat operations

Introduction

Radar and electronic warfare (EW) plays a key role in modern military conflicts. With the advancement of technology and the increasing dependence of armies on electronic warfare systems, the effectiveness of EW is becoming critical to achieving superiority on the battlefield. In this article, we will look at the main aspects of EW, its methods, and its impact on the outcome of military operations.

Basic methods of electronic warfare

1. Jamming : This is a method that interferes with the enemy's electronic systems. Jamming can be aimed at suppressing communications, navigation, and control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

2. Suppression of Air Defense Systems : Using electronic warfare to neutralize air defense systems (ADS) helps ensure the safety of air operations. This is achieved by jamming radars and fire control systems.

3. Signal Simulation : Creating false signals that can mislead enemy systems, distracting them from real targets.

4. Cyber ​​attacks : In the modern context, EW also includes cyber attacks on the enemy's command and communication systems, which can lead to their paralysis.

The impact of electronic warfare on the outcome of military operations

1. Reducing Casualties : Effective use of EW can significantly reduce casualties among personnel and equipment, providing protection from air attacks and artillery fire.

2. Increased combat capabilities : Successfully suppressing enemy air defenses allows for more risky operations, including deep raids and air support for ground forces.

3. Disruption of Command and Control : Suppressing enemy communications can cause disorganization of his forces, creating opportunities for successful attacks.

▎ Conclusion

Electronic warfare is an integral part of modern military strategies. Its effectiveness in combat operations highlights the need for continuous development of technologies and methods in this area. Countries that invest in electronic warfare gain a significant advantage on the battlefield, making this area particularly relevant for study and development in the future.

We recommend of course the channel of our friend Kiba for all those interested in the subject:
https://t.me/signalman_diary

#info
#EW

Soon the work will start to restore the Narva Triumphal Gate.

Before the work began, specialists conducted an extensive study of the work of art, and a conclusion is currently being prepared. The exact time frame for the reconstruction has not yet been established.

The Narva Triumphal Gate was built in 1827-1834 in memory of the heroes of the Patriotic War of 1812.
Architects: V. P. Stasov, sculptors, S. S. Pimenov, V. I. Demut-Malinovsky and P. K. Klodt.

In 1945, the gates greeted the Leningrad Guards Corps at the Victory Parade.
Since 1987, a museum has been located inside the monument.

#meta
#History
#architecture

The children and mother of taxi driver Elena Sarafanova, who was killed by gypsies in Korkino as reported earlier in the channel, received the keys to their new apartment, which was given to the family by the Russian Copper Company.

In addition, RCC helped pay off the mortgage for the apartment where Elena lived with her children previously. Her mother will also receive a monthly allowance from the RCC Charitable Foundation.

#meta
#nationalism