Filius Luminis


Channel's geo and language: not specified, not specified
Category: not specified


Reflections for a future rooted in timeless principles.
Twitter: twitter.com/filius_luminis
Gab: gab.com/SickManOfEurope

Related channels

Channel's geo and language
not specified, not specified
Category
not specified
Statistics
Posts filter


Forward from: Cultured American
"I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either.

Remember, democracy never lasts long.

It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.

It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy.

It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty."


- John Adams










Obviously, “popular” and “frequent” bathing in the medieval context was fundamentally different than in the 21st century. It took much more effort to heat water over fire and coals, and (except for the very wealthy) it meant pumping or hauling water from a well and lugging it to a tub or going to a bathhouse. The latter cost money. Not necessarily a lot of money, but it was not entirely free, and it was certainly less convenient than stepping into a shower at home today. Building dedicated baths with hot and cold water in one’s house was a luxury that only the most wealthy, essentially the nobility, could afford.

So, yes, hygiene would not have been at the same standards as today, but it was understood and valued. The higher a person’s status and the greater one’s wealth, the greater the level of cleanliness obtained. At no time did it sink to Hollywood levels of kings wiping their mouths on their velvet robes or having mice running across their banquet tables.

Note, however, that in the early Renaissance, increasing urbanization led to increasing water contamination, which in turn led doctors to associate communicable disease with water. Water was seen increasingly as “unhealthy” just at a time when the Reformation frowned at the notion of men and women sharing public baths. Bath-houses fell into disrepute and increasingly disappeared from the scene ― without being replaced for several hundred years by private baths.

Thus, while the castles of the late 15th century had hot and cold running water, the palaces of the 18th century had no baths at all. Likewise, while people in the Middle Ages viewed bathing as both hygienic and pleasurable, by the 18th century bathing had been replaced by satchels filled with fat and blood to attract and collect fleas and perfume to cover body odors.

Development is not linear and progress not inevitable. (Line by the author herself)


A favorite Hollywood convention is to portray people in the Middle Ages as filthy. Mice run across dinner tables while dogs fight over bones at their feet. Noblemen wipe their mouths on their sleeves (or hair!), and toss the bones from their plates over their shoulders. The poor are consistently depicted in filthy (and usually ragged) clothing and mud encrusted boots. Yet the evidence we have from the Middle Ages belies this image. (1)

First, we should remember that although the "Middle Ages" started with the "fall" of Rome that refers to the political and military might of Rome not Roman civilization. The customs and habits of people across what had been the Roman Empire from Yorkshire to Palestine were not suddenly extinguished or forgotten simply because the political and military structures that had made it possible to rule an Empire from Rome were gone. Rome fell, Roman thought, customs and knowledge remained in the hearts and minds of people all across the former Empire. That culture included bathing .... (2)

Across the Christian Middle East, Cyprus, Sicily and Spain as well as in the Eastern Roman Empire, bathing and bath-houses remained a feature of daily life — even after Muslim conquests — just as it had been in Roman times. In the West, the situation was less clear cut because this is where the “barbarians” had the greatest impact. Nevertheless, we know from the rule of St. Caesarius, writing in the very start of the 6th century, that nuns and monks were expected to bathe regularly for hygienic purposes. Other texts recommend washing face and hands daily, as well as washing and brushing hair frequently, and keeping teeth "picked, cleansed, and brushed [sic!]" (Pernoud, Regine. Women in the Days of the Cathedrals. Ignatius Press, 1989, p. 84.) (3)

Furthermore, bathing and washing are referred to in romances and depicted in manuscript illustrations throughout the Middle Ages. Washing hands before meals was part of the ritual at every manor and castle as well as in monasteries and convents. Washing clothes was so important that washer women ― always identified as older, respectable women very different from prostitutes ― accompanied armies. Women washing and hanging out clothes to dry are also a motif in medieval manuscript illustrations (even if I couldn’t find an example in the public domain. Here’s another bathing scene instead.) (4)

By the 13th century, possibly as a result of renewed contact with the Eastern (Byzantine) Empire and with the Muslim world during the crusades, bathing became very popular and prominent. Not only did public bath houses become numerous, but wealthier citizens invested in elaborate baths which by the 15th century including hot-and-cold running water fed from roof-top tanks. The water from the baths, incidentally, was also reused to flush the garderobes (toilets). Edward III and his eldest son, the Black Prince, were very partial to this, while the Percy castle of Warkworth in Northumbria is an excellent example of using rainwater to flush toilets.

Even before that, the Franks in the Holy Land built aqueducts, bath-houses and sophisticated sewage systems. (See: Hygiene in the Crusader Kingdoms) The royal palace at Nicosia had more than one bath. The commanderies/castles of the Templars and Hospitalles had baths. The hospitals had baths for the patients and the staff. There were many public baths in Jerusalem and other cities. (One of the largest baths in Jerusalem was located opposite the Convent of St. Anne’s pictured below.) The crusader states also produced and exported scented soaps.


We may have touched upon this before, but the European Middle Ages is still to our day an incredibly slandered time period, pointed as the seat of the worst blames, such as oppression from nobility and royalty, tyranny of the Catholic Church, work slavery, nightmarish living conditions, bad nutrition and bad hygiene. See how it is portrayed every time in Hollywood films.

All of these points have been scrutinised by more honest historians in recent years and more or less all disproven. The portrayal that came to us of the Middle Ages is ironically a projection from later centuries, in which various issues, absent during the Medieval period or very limited, effectively contributed to a worsening of life conditions in Europe. Modern historians have taken it that, if things were so bad in the 19th century, Heaven knows how the could have been before then.

We might touch on other aspects in future posts, but one that is still particularly uncontested is hygienic conditions, so we would like to share an article taken from Quora by History PhD Helena Schrader, responding to the question How clean were medieval people?


Forward from: Ahnenerbe
Krampus Karte 🌲


Forward from: Ahnenerbe
Krampus Karte 🌲


Forward from: Ahnenerbe
Krampus Karte 🌲


Forward from: Ahnenerbe
"In Central European folklore, Krampus is a horned, anthropomorphic figure described as "half-goat, half-demon",[1] who, during the Christmas season, punishes children who have misbehaved. This contrasts with Saint Nicholas, who rewards the well-behaved with gifts. Krampus is one of the companions of Saint Nicholas in several regions including Austria, Bavaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Northern Italy including South Tyrol and the Province of Trento, Slovakia, and Slovenia.[2] The origin of the figure is unclear; some folklorists and anthropologists have postulated it as having pre-Christian origins.

In traditional parades and in such events as the Krampuslauf (English: Krampus run), young men dressed as Krampus participate; such events occur annually in most Alpine towns.[3] Krampus is featured on holiday greeting cards called Krampuskarten."
(source)


Perfect


Forward from: D'Awnsée YakUbra
1. Instate a spiritual aristocracy

2. Build a patron-client system by which people with impractical interests/skills would be supported in their work not by crowdfunding but by that same spiritual elite

3. Formulate a guild system for those with more practical tendencies to organise in the spirit of fraternity rather than mercenary greed and survival

4. Build massive tantric cathedrals

5. Cut labour hours as low as possible across all fields

6. Invest in rail and public transport to try and remove traffic to a point where the roads belong to pedestrians, horses, emergency vehicles, and any local nobility who happen to enjoy motoring. Realistically this would probably involve massively disincentivising cars too, of course

7. Establish something similar to the 15 minute cities everyone was shitting themselves about a few years ago. People in rural areas would never need to leave their villages except for maybe a trip to the nearest large town a couple times a year, the nearest city a few times in their lives.

8. In the cities, make public spaces cosy again. Festivals in the parks and greens when the weather is warm. There would be an absurd amount of feast days in order to facilitate this.

9. Decentralise government along principles of subsidiarity.

10. Decentralise education. Guilds could train people in skills relevant to their respective trades. Basic learning would be done at home. Aristocrats would rely on a system of fosterage for the most part, though there would of course be colleges and universities for those with the inclination and patronage to attend them.


Forward from: Elders IV: No Homo
I’ve got a challenge for you

State 10 things you’d do if you got to make a change in the world, that were wholly positive, rather than negative

Negative being things like TND or ban this and get rid of that.


Forward from: Self-Immolation
"According to the Buddhist teachings, no matter how confused or deluded we may be at the moment, the underlying and essential nature of our being is clear and pure. In the same way that clouds can temporarily obscure but cannot damage the light-giving power of the sun, so too the temporary afflictions of body and mind—our confusion, anxiety, and the suffering they cause—can temporarily obscure but cannot destroy or even touch the fundamentally clear nature of our consciousness. Dwelling deep within our heart, and within the hearts of all beings without exception, is an inexhaustible source of love and wisdom. And the ultimate purpose of all spiritual practices, whether they are called Buddhist or not, is to uncover and make contact with this essentially pure nature."

Lama Yeshe




The egalitarian mind virus is a persistent one, but until it's defeated, the modern world will never be defeated. Enjoy your woke capitalism.


It is also worth pointing out how such an egalitarian model takes away specialisation, everybody is pushed to be a jack of all trades, thrown out in the world to "become someone", gasping in the ocean of the mass to emerge somehow, to climb the rungs of society and "live the dream".

None of that was necessary in the traditional society, every person was given their own place in the cosmos, a sacred duty to fulfill that role to the best degree they could. Striving not for social climbing, but personal excellence.


Every now and then, a reminder of how egalitarianism is bad is in order.

Let us take education as an example. What classically happened is that aristocratic boys had tutors to teach them, in order to have a more complete culture possible that would help them fulfill their duty as aristocrats.

Peasants did not need that kind of education for what they were called to do, neither did the burghers, because they had an art or a trade to bring on from master to apprentice, even reading or writing was not necessary for their aim.

The rise of universities opened a crack in this system, creating a sort of intellectual class that would later rise to defy the consolidated powers in the name of humanism and anthropocentrism, driving away the traditional Medieval society from theocentrism and the universal powers.

Later on, when Liberalism became dominant in the West, the burghers began asking for education for all, and as a consequence exceptional individuals became rarer and rarer. Aristocrats, artists and scholars at large became drowned in massification.

When you have to give everybody the same level of education, then you need to stoop at the lowest common denominator, so you have mediocrity as a result. That is how the wings of the exceptional individuals are clipped.

20 last posts shown.

141

subscribers
Channel statistics