Forward from: John Fassbinder AFP
While I respect calling out any Zionist politician, and an American politician prioritizing Ukraine over our own interests is unacceptable, using the term “Ukraine-first” to describe Dan Crenshaw is a deflection from the more accurate term: Israel-first. Crenshaw’s unwavering loyalty to Israel is well-documented, but calling it out directly would challenge the pro-Zionist orthodoxy that dominates American politics, a line “Catturd” seems unwilling to cross.
Furthermore, Crenshaw’s response only underscores his contempt for Heritage Americans. He boasts about “fighting wars” as though his service benefitted the U.S. But let’s be clear—those wars served Israel’s interests, not ours. The only land Crenshaw truly fought for is Israel. Meanwhile, even the most anonymous dissidents who criticize Jewish power do more to protect and advocate for the future of America’s founding stock than Crenshaw ever has or will.
No self-respecting White person would glorify serving as a pawn in endless foreign wars that drain our blood and resources for foreign benefit. Crenshaw’s record speaks for itself, and it’s a record of betrayal—not service—to the American people.
Furthermore, Crenshaw’s response only underscores his contempt for Heritage Americans. He boasts about “fighting wars” as though his service benefitted the U.S. But let’s be clear—those wars served Israel’s interests, not ours. The only land Crenshaw truly fought for is Israel. Meanwhile, even the most anonymous dissidents who criticize Jewish power do more to protect and advocate for the future of America’s founding stock than Crenshaw ever has or will.
No self-respecting White person would glorify serving as a pawn in endless foreign wars that drain our blood and resources for foreign benefit. Crenshaw’s record speaks for itself, and it’s a record of betrayal—not service—to the American people.