(part 4) A great example why "adaptation, instead of better quality" is not important at all are most software, websites, etc. released in the last years. Yes, you need to adapt to them, but this doesn't mean such services, apps, socials are BETTER than previously. Facebook, MacOS, Chrome, etc. are just some examples, where instead of making progression, we created just downgrades removing important features, ugly design using the "XXXL obsession", where workflows now require 5x more time than previously. So all such things need to be considered. Where is the point if you can be X times faster with AI (where you need to waste Z minutes/hours to verify such things ... if you are not acting like sheeps / average people), but then Y times slower do to all downgrades / limitations services implement to their products ...

So in conclusion, AI will for sure in future replace a lot of jobs, once AI really start to work great. Currently AI still works like shit ... (or at least most services). AI will create jobs too, but all such jobs require at least a bachelor or master, so people without such things are just fucked up. "All such people become just more useless". This is real important to be said, because people with a master generally give a shit to what happens to people without a bachelor! like in the past happened too. If you are not flexible, all that is getting worse, but we cannot use this "be flexible" as an excuse for all jobs that get lost ... Plus this depends from tons of other factors (which jobs, so can AI really be used in your jobs; how you are using AI even related to what you are currently doing; are you scamming people?; it's the same quality once you use AI?, ....)

Go to part 1 https://t.me/ArtificialIntelligenceTelegram/95