We've been researching & compilating a comprehendible timeline of American Usufruct Subjugation, as to reverse engineer the British modus operandi of subjugating unwitting Aussies, along with the rest of the Common-Wealth, thus purloining our life's energy and assets through Unconscionable Contract Encumbrance. I've promptly discovered that they started usurping the American Indians in the sixteen hundreds (as we all know) through the disingenuous use of legalese, being rapacious inland piracy from the onset. Then presumably after 1750 through the use of Sui Generis, (unique) Common Law, AKA more inland piracy regarding the commencement of Human Trafficking through Unlawful Conversion, being the "Dead Baby, Birth Cert Scam".
The world's familiar with the disparaging term "Indian Giver", presumably due to the Bar Association's use of legalese being implemented during negotiations with the American Indians, which was likely brought about through verbal adhesion contracting practices & deceptive definitions. This is duplicitous to say the least. These crimes were implemented through Pressganging Force, which continues till this very day.
I discovered the well written article below (linked at the very bottom), obviously drafted by a knowledgeable author, and have juggled it around for ease of information absorption. I have gratefully taken the authors hints, and gone through their "quoted words" and defined them straight from Black's Law Dictionary as highlighted below. It's all pretty self explanatory.
WHAT WERE THE BROAD PROCESSES by which settlers of European stock created new forms of tenure = (The mode or system of holding lauds or tenements in subordination to some superior, which, in the feudal ages, was the leading characteristic of real property.) and wrested = (Wrong ; injury; the opposite of right So called, according to Lord Coke, be cause it is wrested, or crooked, being contrary to that which is right and straight. Co. Litt 1586.) control of lands from indigenous peoples, first in the Americas and later across wide stretches of Africa and Oceania? Anyone interested in this basic question about colonization and dispossession in an Atlantic world setting may be tempted to think in terms of a great “enclosure movement” that took shape first in England and Western Europe and then extended overseas to the New World, bringing survey lines, fences, and legal rules fostering exclusive access and transferability. More than one historian has pointed in the direction of such an extended conception of enclosure, although none has so far made the case in detail. “When the English took possession of lands overseas, they did so by building fences and hedges, the markers of enclosure and private property,” write Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker.1 In relation to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, E. P. Thompson has also pointed to a connection between enclosure within England and the imposition of private property across the overseas British Empire, notably in India, where the Permanent Settlement of Bengal (1793) represented a particularly brutal and doctrinaire attempt to establish unitary proprietorship over land. Thompson's argument about enclosure and colonization appeared in an essay published late in his life, and it touches on North America, New Zealand, and Africa as well as India.2 Richly suggestive, it remains schematic and preliminary, pointing to a long‐term global movement to privatize the commons that emanated outward from the British Isles. Certainly, there is an intriguing, if rough, coincidence of peak periods of enclosure in England—the Tudor period and the late eighteenth century—with times of imperial expansion and reinvigoration.3
The world's familiar with the disparaging term "Indian Giver", presumably due to the Bar Association's use of legalese being implemented during negotiations with the American Indians, which was likely brought about through verbal adhesion contracting practices & deceptive definitions. This is duplicitous to say the least. These crimes were implemented through Pressganging Force, which continues till this very day.
I discovered the well written article below (linked at the very bottom), obviously drafted by a knowledgeable author, and have juggled it around for ease of information absorption. I have gratefully taken the authors hints, and gone through their "quoted words" and defined them straight from Black's Law Dictionary as highlighted below. It's all pretty self explanatory.
WHAT WERE THE BROAD PROCESSES by which settlers of European stock created new forms of tenure = (The mode or system of holding lauds or tenements in subordination to some superior, which, in the feudal ages, was the leading characteristic of real property.) and wrested = (Wrong ; injury; the opposite of right So called, according to Lord Coke, be cause it is wrested, or crooked, being contrary to that which is right and straight. Co. Litt 1586.) control of lands from indigenous peoples, first in the Americas and later across wide stretches of Africa and Oceania? Anyone interested in this basic question about colonization and dispossession in an Atlantic world setting may be tempted to think in terms of a great “enclosure movement” that took shape first in England and Western Europe and then extended overseas to the New World, bringing survey lines, fences, and legal rules fostering exclusive access and transferability. More than one historian has pointed in the direction of such an extended conception of enclosure, although none has so far made the case in detail. “When the English took possession of lands overseas, they did so by building fences and hedges, the markers of enclosure and private property,” write Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker.1 In relation to the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, E. P. Thompson has also pointed to a connection between enclosure within England and the imposition of private property across the overseas British Empire, notably in India, where the Permanent Settlement of Bengal (1793) represented a particularly brutal and doctrinaire attempt to establish unitary proprietorship over land. Thompson's argument about enclosure and colonization appeared in an essay published late in his life, and it touches on North America, New Zealand, and Africa as well as India.2 Richly suggestive, it remains schematic and preliminary, pointing to a long‐term global movement to privatize the commons that emanated outward from the British Isles. Certainly, there is an intriguing, if rough, coincidence of peak periods of enclosure in England—the Tudor period and the late eighteenth century—with times of imperial expansion and reinvigoration.3