This is one of the most screwed up court cases in history. I’m not even going to post a link from people on our side for this one. Just read the Wikipedia summary which is trying to portray this guy sympathetically and you’ll still be able to put the pieces together.
Mel Mermelstein responded to a cash prize offered to anyone who could provide proof of homicidal gas chambers. His “proof” was an anecdotal account of his family being gassed. Obviously this isn’t proof. He didn’t get the cash prize so he took the people offering the prize to court and sued them.
This is the crazy part. The court claimed they didn’t need proof of homicidal gas chambers because “it is common knowledge.”
So if a suspect is accused of being a serial killer all someone has to do is accuse him and he gets convicted?
This isn’t how evidence works. But this is how the holohoax narrative works. Someone says something happened and it must have happened because they said it did.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mel_Mermelstein