Arguments like these are only effective because whites are universalist and non-whites are not. Under this moral framework, whites are supposed to accept unlimited immigration as a way of righting an alleged past wrong, while non-whites can simply pursue their own interests.
If immigration is a punishment, surely countries like Switzerland which never had overseas empires should be exempt, right? Nope. Non-whites have no qualms about ravaging Switzerland too because it benefits them. They don't actually believe in this universal justice which they are appealing to.
If you simply adopt for yourself the same moral standard non-whites hold themselves to, these arguments roll off like water on a duck's back. We don't want mass immigration because it's not in our interest. End of story.
If immigration is a punishment, surely countries like Switzerland which never had overseas empires should be exempt, right? Nope. Non-whites have no qualms about ravaging Switzerland too because it benefits them. They don't actually believe in this universal justice which they are appealing to.
If you simply adopt for yourself the same moral standard non-whites hold themselves to, these arguments roll off like water on a duck's back. We don't want mass immigration because it's not in our interest. End of story.