People are asking in the chat about how [they] are testing for this new, absolute bullshit FAKE [virus].
They're not. At all.
The only testing they use it's what's known as "means testing", meaning whatever they can con the dumbest among us into believing.
And this, from our research here long ago.
Covid 19 test kit says: "Not for use in diagnostic procedures".
Says it right on the box.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
This article is a good analysis of the hoax.
Looking around the Internet, there are other text kit boxes that do not have this disclosure, but they do say to see the insert. If anybody can find inserts, that would be interesting to look through, too.
In the βCDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panelβ file from March 30, 2020, for example, it says:
Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptomsβ
Dr Kerry Mullis, it's founder, developer, was summarily executed by your [usg] when he shouted this FRAUD to the world.
And:
This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.β
And the FDA admits that:
positive results [β¦] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.β
Inserts say:
These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infectionβ
And:
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.β
I know most of our members whom have been around a while, already know all this, but because people are asking.
Never forget what your own [usg] did you us.
They're not. At all.
The only testing they use it's what's known as "means testing", meaning whatever they can con the dumbest among us into believing.
And this, from our research here long ago.
Covid 19 test kit says: "Not for use in diagnostic procedures".
Says it right on the box.
https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
This article is a good analysis of the hoax.
Looking around the Internet, there are other text kit boxes that do not have this disclosure, but they do say to see the insert. If anybody can find inserts, that would be interesting to look through, too.
In the βCDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panelβ file from March 30, 2020, for example, it says:
Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptomsβ
Dr Kerry Mullis, it's founder, developer, was summarily executed by your [usg] when he shouted this FRAUD to the world.
And:
This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.β
And the FDA admits that:
positive results [β¦] do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease.β
Inserts say:
These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infectionβ
And:
For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.β
I know most of our members whom have been around a while, already know all this, but because people are asking.
Never forget what your own [usg] did you us.