So what happened in the @earn bot? How did the TON Reserve Wallet with half a billion TONs end up there?
I didn't just send you the video above as a perfect description of what happened. When you first watch the video, everything seems obvious: the dog rushed at the motorcyclist and knocked him down.
But re-watching adds detail. The dog didn't lunge. It was on a leash, which the motorcyclist caught. So it was more likely the motorcyclist who attacked the dog, not the other way around.
New evidence plunges us into a sea of theories describing what happened. Why did the dog pull the leash in front of the motorcyclist? Was it accidental or deliberate? If deliberate, then why? Suicide? An attempt to free himself (successful, by the way). Or maybe it was revenge on a specific motorcyclist? A trap of sorts.
How many questions are born on the 10th viewing of this short video. And there is not a single reliable answer.
The same thing happened with the @earn bot. The developers, the Plotvinov brothers, explained to me that there was a bug in the mini app. You could link any wallet. It's not very clear how TON connect missed it though? Is there a hole in it?
In short, the owner of the wallet is allegedly not real. And anyway, it was only possible to brand this wallet.
Therefore, this attack is pointless. As a result, the top applications were cleared, the bug was fixed, and the $Build balance for such wallets was reset.
But whether the version they presented is true is up to you to decide. They did not report any technical details of this "bug".
Again, if I had screwed up with this story, the easiest thing would have been to remove such a wallet, saying that it was just a bug and the wallet was not connected by the real owner. In this case, he still would not have been able to receive $Build tokens.
Share in the comments: do you believe the Plotvinovs' version?
I would say that it is highly likely that this was indeed the case. But there is no complete certainty.
@givemetons
I didn't just send you the video above as a perfect description of what happened. When you first watch the video, everything seems obvious: the dog rushed at the motorcyclist and knocked him down.
But re-watching adds detail. The dog didn't lunge. It was on a leash, which the motorcyclist caught. So it was more likely the motorcyclist who attacked the dog, not the other way around.
New evidence plunges us into a sea of theories describing what happened. Why did the dog pull the leash in front of the motorcyclist? Was it accidental or deliberate? If deliberate, then why? Suicide? An attempt to free himself (successful, by the way). Or maybe it was revenge on a specific motorcyclist? A trap of sorts.
How many questions are born on the 10th viewing of this short video. And there is not a single reliable answer.
The same thing happened with the @earn bot. The developers, the Plotvinov brothers, explained to me that there was a bug in the mini app. You could link any wallet. It's not very clear how TON connect missed it though? Is there a hole in it?
In short, the owner of the wallet is allegedly not real. And anyway, it was only possible to brand this wallet.
Therefore, this attack is pointless. As a result, the top applications were cleared, the bug was fixed, and the $Build balance for such wallets was reset.
But whether the version they presented is true is up to you to decide. They did not report any technical details of this "bug".
Again, if I had screwed up with this story, the easiest thing would have been to remove such a wallet, saying that it was just a bug and the wallet was not connected by the real owner. In this case, he still would not have been able to receive $Build tokens.
Share in the comments: do you believe the Plotvinovs' version?
I would say that it is highly likely that this was indeed the case. But there is no complete certainty.
@givemetons