Type to search
Advanced channel search

TGAlertsBot

Monitoring of keywords in channels and chats
img
ad

TGStat Bot

Bot to get channel statistics without leaving Telegram
img
ad

Telegram Analytics

Subscribe to stay informed about TGStat news.
img
ad

SearcheeBot

Your guide in the world of telegram channels
img
ad

Nicholas J. Fuentes

@nickjfuentes
Channel's geo and language: World, English
Category: Politics

Official telegram channel for Nick Fuentes.
America First: Monday-Friday at 9pm cst
Cozy.tv/Nick
Contact Me: njfuentesblog@gmail.com

Related channels  |  Similar channels
Channel's geo and language
World, English
Category
Politics
Statistics
Is this your channel? Confirm Канал в реестре блогеров РКН? Confirm Channel history
Posts filter

Nicholas J. Fuentes

12 Jan, 17:01

Open in Telegram Share Report
Another note:

This is looking like the beginning of a rerun of the first administration. The signs were there during the election, they were almost impossible to ignore.

But people willfully deceived themselves with a few narratives such as for example that without needing to run for reelection, Trump could be fully unrestrained, or that with the backing of Elon Musk, the Trump could draw on more political capital. Nonsense.

Personnel is policy.
Personnel is policy.
Personnel is policy.

It’s not the what, why, or how— it is the WHO that counts in politics. Once Trump came crawling back to McCarthy in 2021, ditched Project 2025, took money from Miriam Adelson and the liberal tech bros, nominated race mixing fatty JD Vance… it was over.

It doesn’t matter what they say, they can say anything at any time. It matters who they are.
8.3k 1 61 1.3k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

12 Jan, 16:50

Open in Telegram Share Report
Let’s review the events that have transpired between the election and the inauguration:

• Trump and Elon photographed with Caitlyn Jenner

• Neocon Zionists Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz, and Pete Hegseth appointed to key positions

• Homosexuals Ric Grenell, Scott Bessent, and Jacob Helberg appointed to key positions

• Matt Gaetz nominated for AG, forced out of consideration by the media, resigns from Congress and starts an OAN show

• Anti-Trump RINO John Thune succeeds Mitch McConnell as Senate Majority Leader

• Trump fails to end Ukraine War, Putin rejects peace proposal

• Vivek calls Americans lazy

• Elon and his allies declare war on Trump’s base for opposing H-1B visas, Trump backs Elon

• Opponents of H-1B visas banned and unverified on X, algorithm changed to suppress criticism

• Zionist cuckservative Mike Johnson voted House Speaker after endorsement from Trump

• Trump reportedly considers bombing Iran

• Border Czar Homan says the Trump admin can only deport 1.5 million

• Vance says that possibly only 60% of January 6th defendants may be pardoned
8.6k 1 111 1.1k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

12 Jan, 16:40

Open in Telegram Share Report
After discussions with Republican lawmakers, Border Czar Tom Homan says that the Trump admin aims to deport just 1.4 million people.

The admin is counting on “self-deportations” to account for more removals.

Reports say that DHS would require $80 billion annually to deport 1 million illegals per year or $900 billion to deport 1 million illegals per year for 10 years. Republicans have a House majority with just 220 seats.

None of this should come as a surprise. Despite the rhetoric about “mass deportations,” both Trump and Vance were always evasive and dodgy about the details. When pressed, they said their policy was to prioritize “violent criminals,” of which there are fewer than 100,000, and that they were counting on many more to self-deport.

Moreover— the lack of DHS resources is well known. In Trump’s first term, a Republican controlled House and Senate refused to appropriate a mere $18 billion for a border wall until they ultimately lost the House in 2018.

Trump very well may lose the House in 2026. Which gives Republicans 22 months to appropriate $900 billion for 10 years of “mass deportations,” or $320 billion for four. Or $80 billion for one. Good luck getting that past the filibuster in the Senate or with your 2 vote House majority. Not. Going. To. Happen.
9.1k 0 70 1k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

11 Jan, 10:49

Open in Telegram Share Report
Forward from: Hamiltonian Bookposting
Video is unavailable for watching
Show in Telegram
14.7k 0 73 1.7k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 16:35

Open in Telegram Share Report
Elon tried to kill me, banned all my friends, took the checkmarks— and my so-called “friend” says we should all be commending Elon for posting muslim rape gang stats. Okay bro.
24.9k 1 125 3.7k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 16:31

Open in Telegram Share Report
Elon banned a dozen groypers, took verification from half a dozen more antizionists, forced Loomer to grovel and apologize for the H-1B row, declared he would be punishing “negativity,” then called me “shit for brains” for calling out the censorship.

I jumped on two spaces to discuss this, called out David Sacks and Elon, and have now lost a sizable part of my network on X.

In the meantime— Keith posted once about the groypers, detected which way the wind was blowing, and then was silent on each successive development and turned and actually started praising elon as this was happening.

I’m getting really sick and tired of taking the risks and fighting the actually difficult battles so that all of my fellow travelers can live to fight another day. Frankly, it’s bullshit.

I just want people to see what is going on and understand it for what it is and remember.
27.4k 1 87 2.9k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 16:20

Open in Telegram Share Report
I don’t hate Keith, I still think he is a useful ally. But this is a serious problem.

Elon banning 12 of the biggest AF clippers and personalities, then unverifying 7 of the biggest anti-Zionists is a major shot across the bow at the Dissident Right. This is an existential threat to all of our voices and livelihoods.

Let’s all just acknowledge that Keith saw that and instead of standing with the rest of us, decided that it would jeopardize his account so he quietly retweeted the people speaking out about it without saying anything himself, and then quickly pivoted to glaze Elon because that would be the best survival strategy.

It’s extremely pragmatic, I get it. But it’s disloyal.
21.5k 1 67 2.4k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 16:14

Open in Telegram Share Report
Look at the pattern, Keith posted once about the Groypers being banned.

And then once the verifications started to be taken away from big accounts a few days later, not a peep. Just a repost.

Then conveniently a week later— ton of shameless Elon glazing and radio silence on the censorship.

https://t.me/keith_woods/5924
Keith Woods
21.3k 3 36 1.5k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 16:03

Open in Telegram Share Report
This is all you need to see.

“Hey why would we glaze Elon when he just fucked all of us over”

“Erm well I reposted people talking about that!” Seriously? What a fucking joke.
https://x.com/keithwoodsyt/status/1876987677809037627
23.8k 3 57 1.5k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 15:57

Open in Telegram Share Report
Let’s just be honest— the primary reason Keith is amplifying this content is because he is covering his own ass after Elon started taking checkmarks and banning groypers. And everybody knows it.

If Europeans want to post more Visegrad tier content about Muslim rape gangs that’s their prerogative, but I responded to Keith when he said that everybody should be praising Elon for retweeting him.

No, we should actually not be giving Elon credit for reposting Keith’s shameless engagement bait on rape gangs to cover up for the fact that he went to war for foreign labor against the MAGA base and used censorship to win the argument last week.

https://t.me/keith_woods/5922
Keith Woods
No, the politics of Musk and Reform don’t exactly line up with nationalists, but Nick has yet to explain how they’re benefiting over a leftist government is actually at our expense. This would only make sense if Reform were worse for nationalist interests than Labour, or if nationalists were now dro...
17.8k 1 53 1.7k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 13:37

Open in Telegram Share Report
Let’s say someone is trying to get you to do something for them.

And they say things that they know you want to hear so that you will do it.

And once you’ve done their bidding, you realize it actually benefitted them at your expense.

Would you say that you weren’t “baited” or “outmaneuvered” because you “never changed your opinion?”

See, I know this is really complicated, but in politics it’s actually more important to know a person’s motivations than whatever it is they are saying on the internet.
20.2k 3 80 2.2k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

9 Jan, 13:20

Open in Telegram Share Report
This is something really funny about my exchange with Keith and Joel yesterday.

Keith praised Elon Musk for amplifying European crime statistics which show that Muslims are responsible for a disproportionate amount of violent sexual crimes.

I replied and questioned how valuable Musk’s advocacy really is, considering that he has an ulterior motive for amplifying that narrative, which is to use migrant sex crimes as a wedge to overthrow the Left-Wing labour government and install one of his center-right proxies.

So— is that really commendable? And how beneficial is it? Considering that Musk is only leaning into these populist narratives to secure his political interests, which are actually opposed to ours, I don’t think that is praise-worthy.

I said that this is a classic example of the radical right being enticed or “baited” with strong rhetoric into empowering a center-right party, which is actually against us, and thus being “outmaneuvered” politically.

But Keith and Joel both reply that they are not being “baited” or “outmaneuvered” because they aren’t “changing their position.” LOL. Guys, it turns out that as long as you don’t “change your position,” you can never be tricked or outmaneuvered politically.
20.7k 4 89 2.1k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:58

Open in Telegram Share Report
Elon went from demanding Indian immigrants to attacking Pakistani immigrants.

… uh yeah thats crazy
20.2k 1 55 2.4k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:57

Open in Telegram Share Report
Lol
21.6k 0 46 2k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:37

Open in Telegram Share Report
How does a man with a $450 billion net worth, who meets with the Pope and President, who controls America’s most valuable automaker, the world’s most valuable private company, and a 1 billion user social platform— how does THAT person think about the world?

Does he read posts online, like you, you fucking stupid retard? And formulate “takes” and “opinions” based on a whim? Or do you think he has a truly global and strategic mindset?

Like this is not hard to understand.
20.9k 0 94 2.4k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:29

Open in Telegram Share Report
Once again. For the 6 millionth time. This just demonstrates that Musk is NOT an ideological ally. He is not an ethnic nationalist, a white nationalist, or even really a race realist. Nor is he sympathetic. He opposes those things.

To the extent that Musk panders to the populist right, it is in pursuit of his POLITICAL INTEREST as a billionaire. In this case, he is amplifying Rotherham NOT out of altruism or as a dogwhistle— but for purely POLITICALLY INTERESTED reasons.

Such as first and foremost installing a center-right proxy as PM of the UK but also probably to bolster his alliance with India. You see this play out over and over.

This is why Musk supports Milei and Bukele, but uses X to wage war on Maduro and Lula. This is why he made a stink about free speech in Brazil but not in Turkey or India. And this is why for him the rape gangs are about Islamabad and overthrowing Keir Starmer, and not about mass deportations or remigration.
19.9k 0 76 2k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:25

Open in Telegram Share Report
I was actually typing up a message earlier about how it is very crucial that the Rotherham case involves *Pakistanis*

Musk is calling for the UK to terminate foreign aid to Pakistan. Not only is Pakistan the arch nemesis of India but they are also China’s version of “closest ally.”

Musk is obviously aligned with India for geopolitical and financial reasons.
18.6k 0 58 1.8k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:23

Open in Telegram Share Report
“Elon deserves lots of credit for just plain putting out the data on rape gangs (that I posted)”

*5 minutes later*

“DO NOT BLAME THE INDIANS, IT’S THOSE VILE PAKISTANIS!!!”
18.4k 0 40 1.8k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:21

Open in Telegram Share Report
Literally vindicated in real time.

https://x.com/nickjfuentes/status/1877012311715590192
18.4k 0 59 1.7k
Nicholas J. Fuentes

8 Jan, 18:05

Open in Telegram Share Report
😔
18.1k 0 23 1.3k
20 last posts shown.