Iberomaurusian Reconstruction: Ancestral Whispers.
An actual reasonable Iberomaurusian reconstruction for once without blacking it, and surprisingly from notorious reconstruction blackers.
It is interesting they admit they are morphologically similar in appearance to Upper Paleolithic Europeans (first Europeans) but that is not due to Iberomaurusian's "Ancestral North African" (ANA) ancestry, but shared recent Dzudzuana-HG-like ancestry.
Early Dzudzuana-HG-like peoples colonised Europe as well as North Africa. The former having little to mix with and the latter mixing with ANA peoples; so shared alleles are expected but mostly not direct between Europe and North Africa (with the exception of Spain).
It is however interesting that despite Iberomaurusian's 45% ANA ancestry, they maintained the same morphology/ appearance as the colonising Dzudzuana-HG. Giving credence to ANA not being Sub Saharan-like. Which is logical, given ANA and Paleolithic DHG only recently split on the timeline.
An actual reasonable Iberomaurusian reconstruction for once without blacking it, and surprisingly from notorious reconstruction blackers.
It is interesting they admit they are morphologically similar in appearance to Upper Paleolithic Europeans (first Europeans) but that is not due to Iberomaurusian's "Ancestral North African" (ANA) ancestry, but shared recent Dzudzuana-HG-like ancestry.
Early Dzudzuana-HG-like peoples colonised Europe as well as North Africa. The former having little to mix with and the latter mixing with ANA peoples; so shared alleles are expected but mostly not direct between Europe and North Africa (with the exception of Spain).
It is however interesting that despite Iberomaurusian's 45% ANA ancestry, they maintained the same morphology/ appearance as the colonising Dzudzuana-HG. Giving credence to ANA not being Sub Saharan-like. Which is logical, given ANA and Paleolithic DHG only recently split on the timeline.