Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 5
The Chemical Castration of Recidivist Sex Offenders in Canada: A Matter of Faith: It is concluded that chemical castration of sex offenders is ethically problematic, that evidence for its effectiveness in preventing recidivism is limited and of poor quality and that judges should avoid excessive reliance on chemical castration when deciding to grant conditional release to recidivist sex offenders.
Castration -- physical or chemical -- however, does not guarantee that a man will forever be sexually dysfunctional or that he won't again commit rape https://perma.cc/7KVM-FGN7
Joo Yong Lee: Surgical castration reportedly produces definitive results, even in repeat pedophilic offenders, by reducing recidivism rates to 2% to 5% compared with expected rates of 50% 🤦♂️ what does it means??! ... better not to investigate such thing ...
Nope, we needed to check the source of such thing. What they wrote is:
The main effect of surgical castration is a reduction of the circulating androgen level by removing the testes where approximately 95% of the testosterone is produced.
In Europe, estimated recidivism rates based on re-arrest or conviction were 2.5–7.5% in surgically castrated sex offenders versus 60–84% before castration (n 1200) with a maximal follow-up of 20 years (Heim and Hursch 1979).
Thirty-five percent of young surgical castrates retained sexual functioning (sex drive and potency) (Heim and Hursch 1979) and 19 out of 38 castrated sex offend- ers, whose penile erections were measured while viewing a sex movie, exhibited full erections (Eibl 1978).
In a prospective study (follow-up 15 years), Zverina et al. (1991) reported that 18% of 84 castrated sex offenders retained sexual functioning and that 21% were able to maintain sexual relation- ships with their sexual partner.
However, some physically castrated paedophiles have restored their potency by taking exogenous testosterone and then abused again (Stone et al. 2000).
The Chemical Castration of Recidivist Sex Offenders in Canada: A Matter of Faith: It is concluded that chemical castration of sex offenders is ethically problematic, that evidence for its effectiveness in preventing recidivism is limited and of poor quality and that judges should avoid excessive reliance on chemical castration when deciding to grant conditional release to recidivist sex offenders.
Castration -- physical or chemical -- however, does not guarantee that a man will forever be sexually dysfunctional or that he won't again commit rape https://perma.cc/7KVM-FGN7
Joo Yong Lee: Surgical castration reportedly produces definitive results, even in repeat pedophilic offenders, by reducing recidivism rates to 2% to 5% compared with expected rates of 50% 🤦♂️ what does it means??! ... better not to investigate such thing ...
Nope, we needed to check the source of such thing. What they wrote is:
The main effect of surgical castration is a reduction of the circulating androgen level by removing the testes where approximately 95% of the testosterone is produced.
In Europe, estimated recidivism rates based on re-arrest or conviction were 2.5–7.5% in surgically castrated sex offenders versus 60–84% before castration (n 1200) with a maximal follow-up of 20 years (Heim and Hursch 1979).
Thirty-five percent of young surgical castrates retained sexual functioning (sex drive and potency) (Heim and Hursch 1979) and 19 out of 38 castrated sex offend- ers, whose penile erections were measured while viewing a sex movie, exhibited full erections (Eibl 1978).
In a prospective study (follow-up 15 years), Zverina et al. (1991) reported that 18% of 84 castrated sex offenders retained sexual functioning and that 21% were able to maintain sexual relation- ships with their sexual partner.
However, some physically castrated paedophiles have restored their potency by taking exogenous testosterone and then abused again (Stone et al. 2000).