Now let we discuss this video: compared to previous video, here the topic "what do you mean with gender" is presented and trans are considering it more as gender identity, while the teacher instead continues to consider it just as biological gender, like the dude saying there is a relation between gender (identity) and sex. So he is ignoring the other type of classifications about "gender".
Obviously there is a relation, at the end many men and many women are acting pretty in the same way, but there are still "black sheeps", for example men interested on men + women or just women topics; or women interested on women + men or just men topics.
Without birth defects etc. men can feels like women, especially if they have pretty similar anatomical characteristics (for example having body fat in the same zones women have too or "having less muscle like the average women", etc.). Obviously all such people that give a shit to such things will probably not understand that. People interested in fitness should better understand all that. But this is not just about that ... just think girls wanting to do jobs normally done by men ...
Gender (if not considered as biological gender ... see previous posts), on the other hand, is socially, culturally and personally defined. It includes how individuals see themselves (gender identity), how others perceive them and expect them to behave (gender norms), and the interactions (gender relations) that they have with others. Often one’s gender aligns with one’s sex: Men tend to assume more masculine behaviors and traits, and to be seen as masculine by others around them, for example. But not always. Increasingly, researchers like Stefanick and Schiebinger are realizing that both men and women exhibit a spectrum of gender traits that aren’t purely masculine or feminine.
There is not hate at all —> this is correct
You are giving a concluse —> what conclusion should be that? If they say to you, that they want to talk about gender as identity and not as biological gender ...
Obviously there is a relation, at the end many men and many women are acting pretty in the same way, but there are still "black sheeps", for example men interested on men + women or just women topics; or women interested on women + men or just men topics.
Without birth defects etc. men can feels like women, especially if they have pretty similar anatomical characteristics (for example having body fat in the same zones women have too or "having less muscle like the average women", etc.). Obviously all such people that give a shit to such things will probably not understand that. People interested in fitness should better understand all that. But this is not just about that ... just think girls wanting to do jobs normally done by men ...
Gender (if not considered as biological gender ... see previous posts), on the other hand, is socially, culturally and personally defined. It includes how individuals see themselves (gender identity), how others perceive them and expect them to behave (gender norms), and the interactions (gender relations) that they have with others. Often one’s gender aligns with one’s sex: Men tend to assume more masculine behaviors and traits, and to be seen as masculine by others around them, for example. But not always. Increasingly, researchers like Stefanick and Schiebinger are realizing that both men and women exhibit a spectrum of gender traits that aren’t purely masculine or feminine.
There is not hate at all —> this is correct
You are giving a concluse —> what conclusion should be that? If they say to you, that they want to talk about gender as identity and not as biological gender ...