Видео недоступно для предпросмотра
Смотреть в Telegram
Remember, better a 🐶 in 🕊, than a 🐶 with 🩸💀⚠️, if you really love such 🐶!
Better a 🧍♂️ in 🕊, than a 🧍♂️ with 🩸💀⚠️, if you really love such🧍♂️! and this is their wish!
So again death penalty is not just like human euthanasia
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/86
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/84
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/85
but exactly like animal euthanasia too! that get ABUSED BY PEOPLE DAY BY DAY!
What is not ok is ABUSING SUCH THINGS for ignorance!
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
Better a serious criminal in 🕊, than a serious criminal in 👮♂️ and few years later free, ready to continue such crimes!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43
No matter if such criminal will redo or not the crime = eating people again, or stop to eating people
https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/75
BECAUSE THE RISK TO RESTART EATING PEOPLE, exactly like many people regain all lost weight after a crazy diet just after few years ..., is much more important than "the fake human rights of a criminal to return back in society like an innocent"!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/66
Again, this obviously related to serious crimes, not for stealing a stupid 🃏 like in Prison Break! or stealing 500$ or or or!
So yes, BETTER TO KILL A SERIOUS CRIMINAL (even if recidivism could be 0%!) = 0 innocent are killed, than keeping alive a serious criminal = for sure there are NOT 0 innocent killed! even by considering that many crimes are simply NOT reported at all! or the police doesn't deserve enough attention!
Same can be said for life sentence! BETTER A SERIOUS CRIMINAL IN PRISON FOR LIFE (even if recidivism could be 0%) than seeing another massacre!
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/768
and this is what our governments are doing SOMETIMES! not always! = nothing new
The only difference? Keeping in life a serious criminal IS WASTED MONEY we can deserve for not criminal people that really need such money!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/384
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/386
Better a 🧍♂️ in 🕊, than a 🧍♂️ with 🩸💀⚠️, if you really love such🧍♂️! and this is their wish!
So again death penalty is not just like human euthanasia
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/86
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/84
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/85
but exactly like animal euthanasia too! that get ABUSED BY PEOPLE DAY BY DAY!
What is not ok is ABUSING SUCH THINGS for ignorance!
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
Better a serious criminal in 🕊, than a serious criminal in 👮♂️ and few years later free, ready to continue such crimes!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43
No matter if such criminal will redo or not the crime = eating people again, or stop to eating people
https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/75
BECAUSE THE RISK TO RESTART EATING PEOPLE, exactly like many people regain all lost weight after a crazy diet just after few years ..., is much more important than "the fake human rights of a criminal to return back in society like an innocent"!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/66
Again, this obviously related to serious crimes, not for stealing a stupid 🃏 like in Prison Break! or stealing 500$ or or or!
So yes, BETTER TO KILL A SERIOUS CRIMINAL (even if recidivism could be 0%!) = 0 innocent are killed, than keeping alive a serious criminal = for sure there are NOT 0 innocent killed! even by considering that many crimes are simply NOT reported at all! or the police doesn't deserve enough attention!
Same can be said for life sentence! BETTER A SERIOUS CRIMINAL IN PRISON FOR LIFE (even if recidivism could be 0%) than seeing another massacre!
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/768
and this is what our governments are doing SOMETIMES! not always! = nothing new
The only difference? Keeping in life a serious criminal IS WASTED MONEY we can deserve for not criminal people that really need such money!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/384
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/386