#AntiFakeOfTheDay
💬 The Western adherents of alternative history do not stop trying to cleanse the media landscape of the truth. Every June, year after year, British, European & other media routinely hone their anti-Russia skills & write that in reality the Russians lost the Battle of Prokhorovka 80 years ago. Another biased article on this subject was published on June 8 this year by The Times. It refers to the book on Prokhorovka tanks by Ben Wheatley from the University of East Anglia.
2023 is a special year for our country’s military history. We are celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Prokhorovka, the Battle of Stalingrad & the Battle of Kursk, as well as of the lifting of the Siege of Leningrad. It is no surprise that Western propaganda has unleashed a whole book of anti-historical fakes, in the worst traditions of custom-made pseudoscientific fiction on the history of World War II , thereby whipping up the information & psychological components of the hybrid war being waged against Russia.
Read in full
Habitually questioning the primacy of our victory, Western propaganda tries to dissect it by diminishing the importance of critical battles.
The victory of the Red Army in the Battle of Kursk intensified anti-war sentiments in the Axis powers & influenced the decision of the US & Britain to open the second front. The result is well known to all: salvation from the brown plague that had engulfed Europe.
We agree with the author of the article in one thing only: the victory in the WWII indeed required titanic efforts. Their results are reflected in the legal documents of international tribunals.
And Prokhorovka is still there, 56 kilometres from Belgorod. It is hard to believe that 80 years after those events the Belgorod Region is still being attacked by the Nazis. The pseudo-historians who methodically & unscrupulously try to erase & rewrite historical memory have also contributed to this. We are sure that history itself will be their judge.
💬 The Western adherents of alternative history do not stop trying to cleanse the media landscape of the truth. Every June, year after year, British, European & other media routinely hone their anti-Russia skills & write that in reality the Russians lost the Battle of Prokhorovka 80 years ago. Another biased article on this subject was published on June 8 this year by The Times. It refers to the book on Prokhorovka tanks by Ben Wheatley from the University of East Anglia.
2023 is a special year for our country’s military history. We are celebrating the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Prokhorovka, the Battle of Stalingrad & the Battle of Kursk, as well as of the lifting of the Siege of Leningrad. It is no surprise that Western propaganda has unleashed a whole book of anti-historical fakes, in the worst traditions of custom-made pseudoscientific fiction on the history of World War II , thereby whipping up the information & psychological components of the hybrid war being waged against Russia.
Read in full
Habitually questioning the primacy of our victory, Western propaganda tries to dissect it by diminishing the importance of critical battles.
The victory of the Red Army in the Battle of Kursk intensified anti-war sentiments in the Axis powers & influenced the decision of the US & Britain to open the second front. The result is well known to all: salvation from the brown plague that had engulfed Europe.
We agree with the author of the article in one thing only: the victory in the WWII indeed required titanic efforts. Their results are reflected in the legal documents of international tribunals.
And Prokhorovka is still there, 56 kilometres from Belgorod. It is hard to believe that 80 years after those events the Belgorod Region is still being attacked by the Nazis. The pseudo-historians who methodically & unscrupulously try to erase & rewrite historical memory have also contributed to this. We are sure that history itself will be their judge.