🎙Interview of Russia's Ambassador to Sweden Sergey Belyayev with TASS news agency (November 20, 2024)
Key points
• It is no secret that there have always been anti-Russia sentiments in Sweden. There is even a special word in the Swedish language that literally translates as “fear of Russians” (rysskräck). However, both sides benefited when Sweden managed to step aside from its historical phobias and to develop relations with its eastern neighbour pragmatically.
• Stockholm’s neutrality during the two world wars laid the foundation for the Swedish socioeconomic miracle. Throughout the Cold War and until recently, Sweden’s non-alignment policy strengthened its global prestige, including as an intermediary in international conflicts and an unbiased arbiter in economic disputes.
• Regrettably, Sweden is currently an unfriendly country that sends weapons to the neo-Nazi Kiev regime, is active on the anti-Russia sanctions track, and has cut our political dialogue to a minimum. It is clear that the resumption of relations in the normal regime is out of the question in this situation.
• Russia has repeatedly assessed the utterly negative consequences of Stockholm renouncing its more than 200-year-old policy of neutrality and military non-alliance. It was clear for us from the outset that Stockholm’s desire to join this military bloc can only entail a rise in tensions in the Baltic and Arctic regions, turning them from a cooperation zone to the sphere of potential military and political confrontation.
• I firmly believe that the majority of Swedes do not share their politicians and officials’ policy of cancelling Russia, despite the rampant Russophobic campaign in the local media.
Read in full
Key points
• It is no secret that there have always been anti-Russia sentiments in Sweden. There is even a special word in the Swedish language that literally translates as “fear of Russians” (rysskräck). However, both sides benefited when Sweden managed to step aside from its historical phobias and to develop relations with its eastern neighbour pragmatically.
• Stockholm’s neutrality during the two world wars laid the foundation for the Swedish socioeconomic miracle. Throughout the Cold War and until recently, Sweden’s non-alignment policy strengthened its global prestige, including as an intermediary in international conflicts and an unbiased arbiter in economic disputes.
• Regrettably, Sweden is currently an unfriendly country that sends weapons to the neo-Nazi Kiev regime, is active on the anti-Russia sanctions track, and has cut our political dialogue to a minimum. It is clear that the resumption of relations in the normal regime is out of the question in this situation.
• Russia has repeatedly assessed the utterly negative consequences of Stockholm renouncing its more than 200-year-old policy of neutrality and military non-alliance. It was clear for us from the outset that Stockholm’s desire to join this military bloc can only entail a rise in tensions in the Baltic and Arctic regions, turning them from a cooperation zone to the sphere of potential military and political confrontation.
• I firmly believe that the majority of Swedes do not share their politicians and officials’ policy of cancelling Russia, despite the rampant Russophobic campaign in the local media.
Read in full