Видео недоступно для предпросмотра
Смотреть в Telegram
🗣 Macron's words on anonymity remain as alarming as ever
Seven years ago, Emmanuel Macron openly declared that "we will have to gradually eliminate all forms of anonymity." There was no moral emergency at the time, no children to protect, no urgent crisis—just a straightforward desire to control public discourse, acknowledged without hesitation.
The troubling part isn't just the statement itself, but how it sounds almost normalized today. When political leaders talk about "gradually" removing anonymity, they rarely mean criminals. They mean ordinary citizens who express dissent, journalists who protect sources, activists who organize under oppressive regimes. The word gradually is doing heavy lifting here—it softens the blow while normalizing the erosion of a fundamental right.
Anonymity is constantly framed as a shield for bad actors, but in reality it's what allows whistleblowers to come forward, victims of persecution to speak out, and dissidents to coordinate without fear of retaliation. Stripping it away doesn't stop crime—it silences the vulnerable first and leaves the powerful unaccountable.
The danger isn't a single law or a single speech. It's the slow acceptance that privacy is negotiable, that rights can be traded for the illusion of security. And once that trade is made, history shows those rights are rarely returned.
👍 Follow us to stay informed about the latest threats and protect yourself.
#DigitalRights #OnlinePrivacy #FreeSpeech #CyberSecurity #AnonymityMatters
@PrivacyNotACrime 🗽 🎼 Chat
Seven years ago, Emmanuel Macron openly declared that "we will have to gradually eliminate all forms of anonymity." There was no moral emergency at the time, no children to protect, no urgent crisis—just a straightforward desire to control public discourse, acknowledged without hesitation.
The troubling part isn't just the statement itself, but how it sounds almost normalized today. When political leaders talk about "gradually" removing anonymity, they rarely mean criminals. They mean ordinary citizens who express dissent, journalists who protect sources, activists who organize under oppressive regimes. The word gradually is doing heavy lifting here—it softens the blow while normalizing the erosion of a fundamental right.
Anonymity is constantly framed as a shield for bad actors, but in reality it's what allows whistleblowers to come forward, victims of persecution to speak out, and dissidents to coordinate without fear of retaliation. Stripping it away doesn't stop crime—it silences the vulnerable first and leaves the powerful unaccountable.
The danger isn't a single law or a single speech. It's the slow acceptance that privacy is negotiable, that rights can be traded for the illusion of security. And once that trade is made, history shows those rights are rarely returned.
👍 Follow us to stay informed about the latest threats and protect yourself.
#DigitalRights #OnlinePrivacy #FreeSpeech #CyberSecurity #AnonymityMatters
@PrivacyNotACrime 🗽 🎼 Chat