For those maybe coming here by citing this study where is written "A total of 141 studies were included, mostly from Europe, South/East Asia, and North America. Protein intake was lower in people following plant-based diets compared to meat-eaters, but well within recommended intake levels"
1) yes we know that, they write "Average protein intakes were above the lower limit of the acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR) (i.e., 10%E). None of the studies reported protein intakes below the AMDR for any dietary pattern"
2) now the topic is no find if ø are covering that or whatever, but more the fact that we cannot say "all people cover protein intake" since there are many different situations / diseases, etc., protein intake change by person and person, is related to tradition / religious / countries related aspects, etc. SO THERE IS HUGE DIFFERENCE!
Even this study is saying "for older adults it can be difficult to obtain sufficient protein", like many other researchers are saying too. So saying "all people from 0J to 120J can follow a vegan diet by getting enough protein" is just bullshit.
3) Protein != Protein. So ok protein intake, but we need to talk about much more behind that...
4) Even here they put focus on "it has been suggested that dietary protein requirements of vegetarians and vegans should be increased by about 20%"
5) How such data is collected is even important
6) Supplementary Materials (not available in the PDF directly) is saying that many studies not cited the point 5, or FFQ or 3 days record or 24 Recall. Exact data of protein intake is not published
Another study (NuEva) writes "Still, the average intake of total protein, PUFA, particularly n-3 PUFA, pantothenic acid, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, vitamin A, vitamin D, calcium, potassium, iron (women), and zinc was markedly lower than recommended by the DGE" and "supplementation of calcium and vitamin D and ensuring an adequate intake of high-quality protein to avoid an elevated fracture risk or the development of osteoporosis"
1) yes we know that, they write "Average protein intakes were above the lower limit of the acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR) (i.e., 10%E). None of the studies reported protein intakes below the AMDR for any dietary pattern"
2) now the topic is no find if ø are covering that or whatever, but more the fact that we cannot say "all people cover protein intake" since there are many different situations / diseases, etc., protein intake change by person and person, is related to tradition / religious / countries related aspects, etc. SO THERE IS HUGE DIFFERENCE!
Even this study is saying "for older adults it can be difficult to obtain sufficient protein", like many other researchers are saying too. So saying "all people from 0J to 120J can follow a vegan diet by getting enough protein" is just bullshit.
3) Protein != Protein. So ok protein intake, but we need to talk about much more behind that...
4) Even here they put focus on "it has been suggested that dietary protein requirements of vegetarians and vegans should be increased by about 20%"
5) How such data is collected is even important
6) Supplementary Materials (not available in the PDF directly) is saying that many studies not cited the point 5, or FFQ or 3 days record or 24 Recall. Exact data of protein intake is not published
Another study (NuEva) writes "Still, the average intake of total protein, PUFA, particularly n-3 PUFA, pantothenic acid, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, vitamin A, vitamin D, calcium, potassium, iron (women), and zinc was markedly lower than recommended by the DGE" and "supplementation of calcium and vitamin D and ensuring an adequate intake of high-quality protein to avoid an elevated fracture risk or the development of osteoporosis"