Cemil Kerimoglu


Гео и язык канала: Весь мир, Английский
Категория: Блоги


News and commentary on politics, history and culture. Mostly about, but not limited to, Eastern Europe and Russia.

Связанные каналы

Гео и язык канала
Весь мир, Английский
Категория
Блоги
Статистика
Фильтр публикаций


Видео недоступно для предпросмотра
Смотреть в Telegram
The Russian propagandist Vladimir Solovyov muses with the idea of repopulating the Russian-occupied Ukrainian territories with North Koreans, Iranians and Syrians. He might appear to be somewhat joking, but there is always an element of truth to every joke. Notably, this idea conforms to the historical pattern that has defined Russian conquests -- i.e., ethnic cleansing done by large-scale population transfers and resettlement. Russians already are transferring a large number of Central Asians to Mariupol to replace the ethnic Ukrainians whom they killed.

How is this not the genocide of a white European nation? How is this not White Genocide, not in a figurative but literal sense? How can any Western nationalist/conservative feel even an ounce of sympathy for Russia? How can one still fall into the asinine Russian narrative of "Russia protecting the Russian-speakers in Ukraine"? From the very start Russia has been ethnically cleansing those "Russian-speaking" Ukrainians in eastern and southern regions.


I imagine the contrarian retards seething with rage. Of course, a European nation defending itself against barbarian hordes must be some "globalist conspiracy".


Monday. Ukraine wakes up to horrible news once again. Another brutal Russian attack kills almost entire family in the city of Kryvyi Rih. The Russian missile killed a mother along with her ten-year old, two-year-old and two-month-old children. The father was the only family member to survive the attack.

Thursday. Russia launched a combined attack of drones and missiles on the historic old town of Odesa -- UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Sunday morning. One of the largest Russian attacks on Ukraine. During the night russians launched almost 120 missiles and 90 drones all over Ukraine.

Sunday evening. Another russian missile attacks residential building in Sumy, killing at least eight civilians including two children.

Just another week in Ukraine.

Just another reminder to those who call on to avoid escalation.

Just another reminder to those who believe peace is possible with Russia.

Just another reminder those who think that Russia will stop its encroachments and aggression if they allow Ukraine to fall.

Just another reminder to everyone of the savage, ghastly nature of the Russian people.

Just another reminder that Russia must be destroyed. Rusia delenda est.


Sadly this comes too little too late. And even here it's still neurotically micromanaged. According to the report, Biden authorized the use of ATACMS only in the Kursk region to "send a message" to North Koreans. As if they are responsive to messages. Whatever... Ukraine is still forbidden to use Western-supplied long-range missiles in other parts of Russia.

We should thank the Biden administration for everything it did for Ukraine, and things that it wanted to do but was too fearful and neurotic to do, and move on. Election of Biden in 2020 has been a curse for the West and Ukraine in particular, making the years 2020-2022 a living hell. Ukraine's experience in the last 2.5 years should be a wake-up call and remain in their memory for eternity. Only domestic long-range capabilities, only domestic nuclear weapons are a true security guarantee.

Biden Allows Ukraine to Strike Russia With Long-Range U.S. Missiles - The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/biden-ukraine-russia-atacms-missiles.html


The resurgence of civilizational pride in the West — reflected most prominently in the re-election of Donald Trump and the rise of right-wing parties across Europe — is a development that countries like Ukraine should embrace. For those who long to join the Western family, this cultural shift offers renewed hope. Moreover, the pro-Russian sentiment of some segments of the political Right in the West is an aberration — a distortion of their worldview — that does not reflect any natural affinity between Western nationalism and being pro-Russian. It is also important not to become overly fixated on the personalities or remarks of individual political figures. What we are witnessing goes beyond any one leader; it signifies a broader cultural awakening in the West, an overdue movement toward self-respect, resilience and pride after decades of guilt-tripping and self-flagellation. Political figures will come and go, but the spirit and identity of the Western people will endure. And that enduring spirit, now beginning to reassert itself, is what truly matters.

The Trump Phenomenon: Why It Is Good for Ukraine
https://cemilk.substack.com/p/the-trump-phenomenon-why-it-is-good


30 years ago Ukraine was forced by the US to renounce its nuclear arsenal and transfer it to Russia alongside with conventional but nuclear-capable missiles under the Budapest Memorandum. 20 years later Russia -- one of its signatories -- attacked Ukraine, and 28 years later launched the full-scale invasion. The other signatory -- US has long hesitated to help Ukraine against this attack, and only belatedly initiated its half-hearted support by drip-feeding aid instead of helping Ukraine fully.
Last year I published this piece about the infamous Budapest Memorandum. It remains as relevant as ever.
https://cemilk.substack.com/p/the-infamous-budapest-memorandum


Samson Option for Ukraine. It's long overdue. Regardless of what the current or future US administrations would do. I really hope Ukrainian nuclear physicists are busy in some bunker developing a nuclear bomb. After all it had endured at the hands of Russia - one of the signatories of the Budapest Memorandum - with the world's connivance, Ukraine has every moral right to acquire nuclear weapons and use them as it pleases. Ukraine was the most betrayed, the most unfairly treated country of the 21st century.


Olaf Scholz said today in the German Bundestag that he was proud to have played his part in ensuring that “there was no escalation” in Ukraine.

Indeed, how wonderful it is that the likes of Joe Biden and Olaf Scholz “avoided escalation” of Russia’s war in Ukraine. The world certainly became a better place. Just Ukrainians somehow didn’t notice.




Normally I don’t promote my writing so strongly (maybe I should). But this is one of those that I really find important and is dear to me. Something that I was intending to write for a long time, but always postponing.

There is a huge misunderstanding about the roots of pro-Russian sentiments among some factions in the political Right. In essence those Russian sympathies do not arise from any natural affinity between Western nationalism and Russia, but rather from deeper psychological causes inherent to some of its proponents. Understanding their motivations is key in light of re-election of Donald Trump in the US and the general nationalist resurgence in the West, which is only natural and, if anything, belated.

This nationalist resurgence in the West in fact provides an opportunity for Ukraine and its supporters. These winds of change can be harnessed and eventually turned in Ukraine’s advantage, turning the dissident Right from its unnatural pro-Russian to a natural anti-Russian and pro-Ukrainian position.

So, as the saying goes, read this article, give it a like and share. And consider subscribing to my newsletter.

Why The Dissident Right Is Pro-Russian - by Cemil Kerimoglu
https://cemilk.substack.com/p/why-the-dissident-right-is-pro-russian


Yet another one of “those” upset with Trump’s cabinet picks. I continue to call them “nationalists” or “dissident Right”, for the lack of a better term. I am doing it out of inertia, also probably influenced by how the mainstream media defines them. But it feels wrong.

The term “nationalist” or “right-wing” presupposes love for one’s own - love for one’s country or the larger civilization. But these people hate their own - something that is normally associated with the Left. Probably future historians will come up with some new terminology for this phenomenon of Third Worldist “right-wingers” that has recently emerged in the West. What term would better apply to them? National-bolsheviks (Nazbols), maybe?


Russia is a backwards Third World country. On many parameters it is not even within say Latin American or Middle Eastern ranges; it competes with African countries. It is basically Africa covered with snow.

There is a very crucial difference between Western conquests and colonialism in the past from the Russian colonialism. Europeans made a better place of the regions they conquered - improving infrastructure, building facilities, curing diseases and much more. After Europeans left the situation got worse in most of their colonies and their inhabitants were eager to relocate to the lands of their former colonizers.

Russians however do the exact opposite. They come to civilized countries and destroy them, sending them significantly backwards in terms of development. And after Russians leave all those places begin to prosper. And needless to say, no Estonian, Pole or Ukrainian is eager to immigrate to Russia, unlike say Africans and Middle Easterners are eager to immigrate to Europe.


Репост из: ꑭ Eternal Muscovite ✙△
>Be Russian
>Be liberated by Ukraine
>Life quality improves

Many such cases.


This is Mike Waltz, Trump’s pick for the national security advisor. Something tells me he will be much better than the spineless and neurotic Jake Sullivan. Moreover, the Third Worldist, “muh NATO expansion”, “muh Russia’s valid interests” crowd are certainly disappointed.


The odious Third Worldists are seething at Trump’s crucial appointments for the Secretary of State - Marco Rubio, and national security advisor - Mike Waltz. Must be a good sign. No Tulsi Gabbard or anyone of her ilk for you.


So, according to the statement by Donald Tusk, Poland is planning to create an alliance in Europe to support Ukraine. The alliance is supposed to include Great Britan, Poland Nordic countries and Baltic countries. Intermarium, anyone?

This is of course framed as being done due to possible risks of Donald Trump abandoning Europe. But this should have been done long ago anyway, regardless of who the US president is. Wasn’t it obvious that Europe, especially Eastern Europe, cannot be forever dependent on the vicissitudes of US politics and the whims of any particular administration? The hesitancy and neuroticism of the Biden administration and the way it blatantly strangled Europeans from action should already have been warning signs, even if Trump were out of the picture. But it’s better late than never.

Europe’s dependency on US for its security can be compared to the modus operandi of the pharmaceutical industry, where the dug is never intended to cure the disease and make the patient healthy, but instead is designed to keep him forever hooked up. US has been such “ drug” for Europe and it’s time to let go of it. We will still be good friends and allies, but should have the capacity to solve our problems without relying on each other.


“If I become chancellor of Germany, I will give Putin an ultimatum regarding Ukraine”, says Friedrich Merz the most likely next German chancellor.

If Putin doesn’t leave Ukraine within 24 hours, Merz is ready to supply Ukraine with Taurus missiles and give permission to strike the territory of Russia.

You know, I am wondering why is it so difficult for others to speak like that?Why can’t the likes of Biden and Scholz say something like this to Putin now? What bad could possibly happen? Nothing of course. It’s just cowardice and neuroticism.

Election of Biden and Scholz have been the greatest curses in recent years that brought us to this predicament. But thankfully it is all being corrected. Although it’s tragic of course that it cost Ukrainians so many lives. Which could have been spared if not for the neuroticism of leftist-liberal managerial establishment.


Ultimately, the root issue lies in the pervasive influence of self-flagellating leftist ideology within Western society. It is this ideological pressure that compels certain factions of the political Right to adopt pro-Russian positions — not because of any inherent or natural affinity between Western nationalism and Russia, but as a byproduct of trying to conform to the dominant cultural ethos. The dissident Right’s sympathy for Russia is, in reality, a secondary and distorted consequence — a misguided attempt to align with the leftist-liberal mindset that discourages criticism of outsiders while elevating self-critique to a moral virtue.


"This pro-Russian sentiment within the dissident Right has deeper psychological roots in the prevailing Western Zeitgeist, which abhors confrontation. In today’s society, assertive or confrontational attitudes, especially toward outsiders, are quickly labeled as “hate”. The current cultural climate emphasizes self-criticism and self-reflection over outward criticism, even when dealing with adversaries. The dissident Right, often accused of being “hateful”, seeks to counter this stigma. To shed this label, they engage in a strange form of overcompensation: since they are criticized for hostility toward some foreigners, they attempt to demonstrate affection for others, choosing Russia as the object of this misplaced admiration.

This also explains Donald Trump’s peculiar praise of figures like Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, and Kim Jong-un. By emphasizing his “good relations” with these leaders, Trump aimed to offset the mainstream liberal narrative that labeled him as hateful for his criticisms of immigrants and internal adversaries. His rhetoric was less about genuine admiration and more about playing along the cultural expectation that confrontation equals hate.

In this light, the dissident Right's pro-Russian stance is not an inherent feature of their ideology but rather an aberration — an attempt to align, paradoxically, with the leftist-liberal Zeitgeist that stigmatizes confrontation. Their rhetoric reflects a desire to conform to a societal climate that prizes outward tolerance, even toward enemies, over any form of resolute opposition. Whereas for the radical Left their pro-Russian stance is a natural characteristic that logically follows from their worldview whose cornerstone is anti-western, even explicitly anti-white hatred. This is because Russia, since the Bolshevik Revolution, has been the vanguard of Third Worldist ressentiment against the West. Basically, for the Left being pro-Russian is a feature, for the dissident Right it is a bug."

Why The Dissident Right Is Pro-Russian - by Cemil Kerimoglu
https://cemilk.substack.com/p/why-the-dissident-right-is-pro-russian


It is worth mentioning again that it's not Trump, but the Democratic governments of Obama and Biden that have been the curse for the West, and most painfully for Ukraine who emphatically gravitates towards it in terms of civilizational belonging.

The deeper issue is that there is an underlying aspect of self-criticism, often escalating to self-hatred and self-flagellation, inherent in the leftist-liberal worldview. By their nature leftists-liberals tend to be inwardly focused. Their primary drive is to castigate their own western society, to correct the internal “social injustice” as they see it. Therefore, instinctively they don’t really tend to be enthusiastic about others being enamored by the Western Civilization. And, by their inner nature, they are not emotionally equipped to be confrontational with the enemies of the West, because the bulk of their energy is directed inwards - i.e., into deconstructing the West, often to its own detriment, instead of confronting its enemies.

Therefore, in the long-term the dominance of the leftist-liberal Zeitgeist in western societies could be a problem for Ukrainians as they gravitate towards it, even at the prize of sacrificing their lives. Such emphatic love for the West is alien to the liberal mind and I doubt that liberals, instead of all their good intentions and moral integrity in this case, can fully empathize with Ukrainians where it matters the most.

Therefore, the ascension of Trumpism should not be viewed from the lens of the personality traits of one political figure, what he said or did not say, what he might or might not do in the short term, but more holistically. The re-emergence of nationalism with concomitant civilizational self-confidence and pride in the West is something to be welcomed and it transcends the character traits of one individual. And in the long run this is good for countries like Ukraine who sincerely long to be part of the West. It is always good if those whom you want to join are strong and proud, instead of wallowing in self-flagellation.

Показано 20 последних публикаций.