Репост из: Неизвестно
The MINTDAO token uses MINT as its base asset, with 22.57B MINT tokens currently locked under MINTDAO. Burning MINTDAO tokens would leave the corresponding amount of MINT tokens in the bonding curve pool untouched, essentially having a similar effect as burning MINT tokens directly.
However, the use of platform tokens (MINTDAO, GRANT, CREATOR) instead of directly burning MINT tokens serves several purposes:
1. Utility Diversification: Each platform token embodies a specific utility within the platform (e.g., governance for MINTDAO, premium features for CREATOR, funding for GRANT), offering a flexible framework for potential future platform utilities.
2. Wrapping Effect: Utilizing multiple wrapped tokens with MINT as the base asset can enhance token valuation more effectively than a single token model. This approach essentially creates an economy atop MINT.
3. Buy-back and Wrapping Effect: Comparing direct MINT purchases and burns with buying and burning DAO or GRANT tokens, the latter method offers more dynamics in valuation due to the wrapping effect. Wrapping can sometimes be a strategic choice to introduce complexity, reducing predictable speculative actions related to buy-back activities.
In summary, while burning platform tokens indirectly affects MINT in a manner akin to direct burning, this method provides greater utility, flexibility, and dynamic valuation strategies. This is why we opt for MINTDAO, GRANT, and CREATOR tokens over direct MINT token burning.
However, the use of platform tokens (MINTDAO, GRANT, CREATOR) instead of directly burning MINT tokens serves several purposes:
1. Utility Diversification: Each platform token embodies a specific utility within the platform (e.g., governance for MINTDAO, premium features for CREATOR, funding for GRANT), offering a flexible framework for potential future platform utilities.
2. Wrapping Effect: Utilizing multiple wrapped tokens with MINT as the base asset can enhance token valuation more effectively than a single token model. This approach essentially creates an economy atop MINT.
3. Buy-back and Wrapping Effect: Comparing direct MINT purchases and burns with buying and burning DAO or GRANT tokens, the latter method offers more dynamics in valuation due to the wrapping effect. Wrapping can sometimes be a strategic choice to introduce complexity, reducing predictable speculative actions related to buy-back activities.
In summary, while burning platform tokens indirectly affects MINT in a manner akin to direct burning, this method provides greater utility, flexibility, and dynamic valuation strategies. This is why we opt for MINTDAO, GRANT, and CREATOR tokens over direct MINT token burning.