📝 Sheikh Abu Muhammad Al Maqdisi:


🕕 *Series * -

*So That The Compass Does Not Deviate (Part 1)*

🎯These are questions which were directed to a famous Shaykh who is praised by many Islamists and even Jihadists, and these are the answers he gave.

🎯Question: But the Palestinian people want a democratic state. So why do you oppose it?

👉Answer by the Sheikh: I also want a democratic multi-party state in which power will be held by whoever wins the election.

🎯Question: If the communist party won, what would your position be?

👉Answer by the Sheikh: Even if the Communist party won, I would respect the will of the Palestinian people.

🎯Question: If the elections show that the Palestinian people want a multi-party democratic state then what will your position be at that time?

👉Answer by the Sheikh: By Allah, we are a people who have dignity and rights. If the Palestinian people express their rejection of an Islamic State.....then I respect and hold as sacred their will and desire.

…End

🍃Our question today in the context of correcting the concepts is:

👉 Is the one who criticizes this speaker because of this clear falsehood, or criticizes the one who praises him, or says that the one who elegizes him has made a mistake, is such a person an extremist or a Khariji or from among the wicked ones?

👉 Every wise person who understands #Tawheed will answer saying : The one who criticises him is without doubt not from amongst these. And it is necessary to criticise this Shaykh whoever he is, and to clarify that these answers are nullifiers of #Tawheed, and to disassociate from these statements, and to criticise the one who praises this Shaykh, and to say that the one who elegizes him has made a mistake because #Tawheed is greater than all Shaykhs and all men. And upholding it and protecting it and purifying it from impurities in the hearts of the Muslims and in their Aqeedah, in their sayings and their actions, is from amongst the greatest obligations and from the greatest actions.

✅ This answer 👆 is correct, undeniable and fit 100%.

🎯 Well then..! Will this undeniable answer be different if we know that the person who gave these answers is Ahmad Yasin, the founder of Hamas movement?

👉 For the Muwahid who knows that #Tawheed_is_first_and_always and that #Tawheed is the greatest of interests in existence, there will be no difference in the answer regardless of whoever said that statement.

As for the philosophers and cheerleaders and the ones who are stumbling in confusion, they may have a different opinion !

✍🏻- Naasihul Mujahideen (Advisor to the Mujahideen)

—-------

§d *Note:* The aim of this series is not to make Takfeer on individuals who have passed away, nor is it to encourage fighting against the groups that ascribe to Islam even if we differ with them and we consider them as deviated. Our advice to our brothers to avoid clashing with them is a widely known matter. Rather, our goal is to remove the unclarity made by some writings and their vagueness in the matter of #Tawheed, and to restore what is being destroyed and broken by some of the philosophical writings in the structure of #Tawheed.

🕕 سلسلة حتى لا تضل البوصلة(١):

🎯هذه أسئلة وُجّهت إلى شيخ مشهور يُثني عليه كثير من الإسلاميين بل والجهاديين وهذه إجاباته :

🎯سؤال:ولكن الشعب الفلسطيني يُريد دولة ديمقراطية .. وأنت لماذا تعانده ؟
👈جواب الشيخ : وأنا أيضاً أريد دولة ديمقراطية متعددة الأحزاب ،والسلطة فيها لمن يفوز في الانتخابات❗️

🎯سؤال : لو فاز الحزب الشيوعي ،فماذا سيكون موقفك ؟
👈 جواب الشيخ : حتى ولو فاز الحزب الشيوعي فسأحترم رغبة الشعب الفلسطيني❗️

🎯سؤال : إذا ما تبين من الانتخابات أن الشعب الفلسطيني يريد دولة ديمقراطية متعددة الأحزاب ، فماذا سيكون موقفك حينئذٍ ؟
👈جواب الشيخ : والله نحن شعب له كرامته وله حقوق ،إذا ما أعرب الشعب الفلسطيني عن رفضه للدولة الإسلامية ..فأنا أحترم وأقدس رغبته وإرادته❗️إنتهى