TheNebulator


Гео и язык канала: не указан, не указан
Категория: не указана


Takes on news, politics and the universe. Don't call me a journalist.

Связанные каналы  |  Похожие каналы

Гео и язык канала
не указан, не указан
Категория
не указана
Статистика
Фильтр публикаций


Just because Biden didn't mention Russia once in his inaugural address — carefully crafted to project an image of control and confidence, as his speechwriters admitted — that doesn't mean the Democrats' obsession of the past five years isn't still on their minds. Former US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul, who apparently still hopes for a "color revolution" in Moscow, wrote a long and tedious piece in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, regurgitating every single trope about "containing" Russia already known to man.
I'll just focus on one particularly telling bit, where he urges "American social media platforms to de-emphasize or at least provide more information about Kremlin-supported content," such as "downgrading" Russian "propaganda channels" (Google already does that LOL) and forcing BBC (interesting pick) as a counter next to their stuff. He also wants " a common set of laws and protocols for regulating Russian government–controlled media, including bots and trolls" developed with " other democracies around the world."
Thing is, if McFail had any faith in the actual strength of "values" the US is championing, they wouldn't need to be "protected" by this kind of censorship. Him proposing it is the admission his position is bankrupt. Way to go, Misha!


Obama did a lot of this too, and got away with it because any criticism was "racist" of course. But for all that his handlers and backers are trying to pretend, Joe just ain't Obama.


First impressions of Biden's inaugural speech: Short, just like his other speeches. Repetitive. At least he's committed to recycling, even if only the verbiage his speechwriters (Politico has a fascinating behind-the-curtains writeup) put onto his prompter. Lots and lots of trite generalities, which the mainstream media will fawn over but are unlikely to win over the other side. Appeals to "unity" in one breath, but makes sure that "unity" means falling in line behind what the Party thinks is right and just, and any dissent will be "disunity" that cannot be tolerated in Our Democracy. There were even hints of transforming America to better fit "his" vision. Also dripping with hypocrisy about "manufactured facts" and "truth over lies," given Russiagate, Spygate, and 2020 election and the media role in the anti-Trump "resistance."


One more thing: Trump has been the Great Unmasker - and that's not a reference to the virus. His mere presence was enough for everyone to drop their pretenses of civility, impartiality, principles or anything else, and let their raw, true nature come to the forefront. And I mean everyone, from the media to politicians, Democrats as well as Republicans of all stripes, both his supporters and his detractors within the party.
Now the media are telling us America is getting "back to normal" and we're supposed to pretend the past four years never happened, and if we're allowed to remember anything at all it will be Orange Man Bad. It's the biggest gaslighting operation in history.


Perhaps because I was "primed" by Peter Van Buren's writeup about Trump not being a "dictator" even though he had plenty of opportunities, the biggest takeaway from the speech for me was his almost painfully naive belief in the American character, system of government and fundamental goodness. Especially since the party that's about to take over has clearly signaled that NONE of those things are likely to survive for much longer.


He also delivered a very polite warning to Democrats about censorship and wrecking the things he built, even using their own "That's not who we are" phrase. Again, unlikely to work, as his critics never cared for anything he specifically says or did, only for who and what he was.


It struck me as an attempt to leave behind a historical record of his presidency, given that the entire establishment has vowed to write the history so they would be heroes and he a villain. Not sure this one speech will succeed at that, but it sounded like he was trying.


Some off-the-cuff thoughts about Trump's farewell address...


It comes off as "why is the American Empire acting so irresponsibly, when the world needs it to be an adult"? Which is more along the lines of what Washington think-tankery wants the world to think than what befits a Russian statesman, even a former one.
Has anyone told him the burger place where Obama took him for a meal has since gone out of business?


Wasn't sure what to make of ex-president Medvedev's running commentary here. Long, at times painfully naive and seemingly unaware of how things actually function - both in the US and in the world - it tells us more about the author than about the subject. Apparently it was originally intended for the Russian audience. Not sure if that makes it any better, to be honest. https://on.rt.com/azlo




This tactic was pioneered under Obama, btw - anyone criticizing him was automatically "racist," no matter the subject or the argument. Ad hominem all the way. This who/whom "logic" is now the bedrock of Our Democracy.


In normal times, this kind of incendiary and defamatory and yes, racist language would be censured in the US Congress. But these aren't normal times. Commissar Cortez is in charge, and she's letting the Republicans know she regards ALL of them as illegitimate, and bending the knee isn't going to be anywhere near enough.
More proof for my "civil war" version of what happened, if anything.


I just wrote that the US has had a civil war and the Capitol unrest was its last act, when the LA Times provided conclusive proof that I was right.

Trump and his “loyalists” have “damaged American democracy, foreign policy, the economy and our health,” claims law professor David Kaye in an op-ed, arguing that they should be blacklisted and denied jobs, board seats and even services as punishment for their “crime.”

“Shunning may sound primitive, but it is not. It can be a way to reinforce democratic values,” argues Kaye. He praises Simon & Schuster for canceling the book contract of Republican Senator Josh Hawley, then in the same breath says “Republicans need not fear ideological purity tests or constraints on free expression.”

Oh no, the ‘de-Trumpification’ is simply “recognizing the extreme deviance of the Trump administration and asserting a baseline of respect for rule of law,” says Kaye.

Keep in mind that he teaches law at UC Irvine, and is a former UN special rapporteur on *freedom of expression*



Показано 15 последних публикаций.

28

подписчиков
Статистика канала