Senator Matt Canavan gets ACMA to admit YouTube will be banned for children, but not Pornhub:
Senator Canavan: "If Youtube is covered [why isn't Pornhub] covered? [so] show me in the law where [Pornhub] is excluded"
Senator Matt Canavan:
If YouTube is categorized or covered by 63C, returning to Senator Roberts' question, is Pornhub covered? Why wouldn't it be? It's just explicit material, but yes, it's covered, isn't it?
ACMA Representative, James Chrishold:
No, the first thing of 63C, 1(a), is that the platform's sole or significant purpose is to enable online social interaction.
Senator Canavan:
But if YouTube's covered, as a video sharing service for non-explicit content, why wouldn't Pornhub be covered? Is Pornhub covered? I
ACMA:
I think they have very different purposes, yes. Can you explain that to me?
Follow
@zeeemediaWebsite |
X |
Instagram |
Rumble