Chemical Castration ... There is just one thing: DEATH PENALTY! nothing other! Part 3
Part 1 https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2119
Treatment with medroxy-progesteronacetate (in the US; e.g., Provera) or cyproteronacetate (in Europe; e.g., Androcur) does not seem to work by normalizing extreme testosterone levels, but by strongly reducing more or less normal levels of sexual arousal.
In addition, there are serious negative side effects that frequently lead to noncompliance and dropout (e.g., Langevin 1979). The termination of medication may rapidly increase the risk of recidivism (Meyer et al., 1992).
Therefore, hormonal medication is indicated primarily for cases in which sexual arousal plays a central role in offending (e.g., Hall 1996) and should be accompanied by psychological treatment that supports compliance and has its own causal effect on sexual reoffending (Maletzky 1991; Meyer and Cole 1997).
Although treatment before the 1970s was clearly ineffective, neither programs from the 1990s nor publications after 2000 reveal stronger effects than in previous decades
For example, studies that include not only official recidivism data but also self-reports show larger effects 🤣🤦♂️
Conclusion: this meta analysis IS SHIT!
From the provisions of the article above shows that every person has the right to be free from inhumane punishment and degrading human dignity and status, in this case chemical castration is very contrary to Article 7 because at the time of application of chemical castration, the treatment carried out is inhumane or demeaning of someone.
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/101
https://t.me/CannibalTelegram/159
See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2119
Treatment with medroxy-progesteronacetate (in the US; e.g., Provera) or cyproteronacetate (in Europe; e.g., Androcur) does not seem to work by normalizing extreme testosterone levels, but by strongly reducing more or less normal levels of sexual arousal.
In addition, there are serious negative side effects that frequently lead to noncompliance and dropout (e.g., Langevin 1979). The termination of medication may rapidly increase the risk of recidivism (Meyer et al., 1992).
Therefore, hormonal medication is indicated primarily for cases in which sexual arousal plays a central role in offending (e.g., Hall 1996) and should be accompanied by psychological treatment that supports compliance and has its own causal effect on sexual reoffending (Maletzky 1991; Meyer and Cole 1997).
Although treatment before the 1970s was clearly ineffective, neither programs from the 1990s nor publications after 2000 reveal stronger effects than in previous decades
For example, studies that include not only official recidivism data but also self-reports show larger effects 🤣🤦♂️
Conclusion: this meta analysis IS SHIT!
From the provisions of the article above shows that every person has the right to be free from inhumane punishment and degrading human dignity and status, in this case chemical castration is very contrary to Article 7 because at the time of application of chemical castration, the treatment carried out is inhumane or demeaning of someone.
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/101
https://t.me/CannibalTelegram/159
See next post