📲 No, You Can’t Stop Meta Using Your Data via IG Story
#News #Insta
🔻 This article critiques individuals who rely on social media for information without engaging in actual research or understanding how things work, despite having access to vast knowledge through their devices. It emphasizes that posting vague legal declarations on platforms like Instagram is ineffective and serves no real purpose, likening it to a humorous yet futile act. The author argues that such declarations have been repeatedly debunked and are essentially pointless exercises.
🔻 This discussion gained traction after Meta announced plans to incorporate user content into its large language models, prompting a wave of reactions, especially from celebrities like Rafael Nadal. However, the reality is that users have already consented to this usage by agreeing to the terms of service of the apps they use. Meta has clarified that it will collect publicly shared content to train its AI systems, while private messages remain protected.
🔻 For users in the European Union, there is an option to opt out of having their posts used for AI training, but this choice is not available to users in other regions. The text stresses that posting a vague message about legal objections does not constitute a valid legal action and will not prevent Meta from using publicly shared content. It warns that such actions can even make individuals more vulnerable to scams.
🔻 The author encourages readers to educate themselves on legal rights, copyright laws, and the terms of service of the apps they use, rather than relying on misleading social media posts. The article highlights the limitations of social media for complex discussions and the potential dangers of misinformation, arguing that quick, sensational content can distort political discourse and public understanding.
💻 Source
🛡 Powered by V3V Ventures
#News #Insta
🔻 This article critiques individuals who rely on social media for information without engaging in actual research or understanding how things work, despite having access to vast knowledge through their devices. It emphasizes that posting vague legal declarations on platforms like Instagram is ineffective and serves no real purpose, likening it to a humorous yet futile act. The author argues that such declarations have been repeatedly debunked and are essentially pointless exercises.
🔻 This discussion gained traction after Meta announced plans to incorporate user content into its large language models, prompting a wave of reactions, especially from celebrities like Rafael Nadal. However, the reality is that users have already consented to this usage by agreeing to the terms of service of the apps they use. Meta has clarified that it will collect publicly shared content to train its AI systems, while private messages remain protected.
🔻 For users in the European Union, there is an option to opt out of having their posts used for AI training, but this choice is not available to users in other regions. The text stresses that posting a vague message about legal objections does not constitute a valid legal action and will not prevent Meta from using publicly shared content. It warns that such actions can even make individuals more vulnerable to scams.
🔻 The author encourages readers to educate themselves on legal rights, copyright laws, and the terms of service of the apps they use, rather than relying on misleading social media posts. The article highlights the limitations of social media for complex discussions and the potential dangers of misinformation, arguing that quick, sensational content can distort political discourse and public understanding.
💻 Source
🛡 Powered by V3V Ventures