Race Realism Channel


Kanal geosi va tili: Butun dunyo, Inglizcha
Toifa: Bloglar


Infographics, studies, data, biological anthropology, population genetics, etc.

Связанные каналы  |  Похожие каналы

Kanal geosi va tili
Butun dunyo, Inglizcha
Toifa
Bloglar
Statistika
Postlar filtri


Estimated number of people with an IQ equal to or greater than 100, 115, and 130 in the USA and India.

America contains 16 times more people with ≥130 IQ than India, despite India's massive population advantage.

The idea that any Western country requires third world migrants to perform high skilled work is ludicrous.

Graphs produced by Noah Hirsch on X.


Immigrants work less and take more.


In the US, Whites consider being American more important than being White, while non-Whites consider their respective races more important than being American.

https://hereticalinsights.substack.com/p/modern-immigration-the-road-to-ruin


"A new study published by researchers at London's Natural History Museum and Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven has reinforced the claim that Neanderthals and modern-day humans (Homo sapiens) must be classed as separate species in order to best track our evolutionary history."

"The study claims that if interbreeding was the final word in determining species status, then hundreds of distinct species of mammals and birds today would have their separate species status revoked and that without recognizing patterns in evolution and subsequent categorization, the question of when a species first appeared becomes more intractable."

Left-wing activist academics have spent decades arguing that Neanderthals were merely a subspecies of Homo sapiens — a transparent distortion of human taxonomy to support their claim that no human subspecies (races) exist today. Nice to see some academic pushback against this nonsense.

https://phys.org/news/2024-12-neanderthals-modern-humans-classed-species.html


Asians have larger family sizes than Whites, which will obviously skew household income results. This data is almost 10 years old (couldn't find anything more recent) and doesn't account for cohabitation of non-related peoples.

Addendum to this post.


Data in the first image is often used in defense of legal migration, particularly from Asia. Some counter points:

- These migrants are generally the highest achieving representatives of their respective ethnic groups.

- These demographics near exclusively inhabit affluent urban areas; comparing them to Whites, who are comparatively far more rural, is disingenuous.

- When Whites are subdivided by ethnic ancestry, many groups have significantly higher household incomes (2022 census data).

- Household income is not individual per capita income. I couldn't find recent data for per capita income by ethnic ancestry, but even when Whites are grouped together, we still have higher per capita income than multiple non-White ethnic groups whose household incomes are higher than Whites'.


Cape Verde: 400 miles west of Senegal. Uninhabited until it was settled by the Portuguese in the 15th century.

Madagascar: 250 miles east of Mozambique. Uninhabited until it was settled by Indonesians between 350 BC and 550 AD.

Sao Tome and Principe:
155 and 140 miles west of Gabon. Uninhabited until they were settled by the Portuguese in the 16th century.


Cubans are the only Hispanic demographic that voted majority Trump in 2024. Every other Hispanic demographic voted ~55-65% Harris.

Of the ~70 million Hispanics in America, less than 3 million are Cuban. Mexicans, who make up ~60% of Hispanics in America, voted 62% Harris.

Contrary to cuckservative claims, Hispanics are still a huge problem demographic and will likely vote left for generations to come — perhaps indefinitely, judging by most Latin American countries.


Approximate ethnic breakdown of major Trump and Harris donors.

Major Trump donors:
73.1% White
19.2% Jewish
3.8% Lebanese
3.8% White + Indian

Major Harris donors:
64.3% Jewish
28.6% White
3.6% Indian
3.6% White + Jewish

Research by True Discipline on X using these two sources:
https://archive.ph/UP3in
https://archive.is/RMhvx


NBC's 2024 exit polls.

Despite Trump's focus on mass deportation, he did surprisingly well with minorities, other than Blacks and Jews.

This should go without saying, but don't take these poll results as gospel.

(Source)


"It's common knowledge that Asian science is full of fraud. Less common knowledge is that Asian scientists in the US also commit a lot of fraud vs their white peers. For instance, as of 2022 19/29 researchers sanctioned by the ORI are of Asian origin."

"This reflects poorly on university plans to attract Asian STEM talent to replace their white faculty. Ability isn't enough - you also need honesty."

"source: https://ori.hhs.gov/content/case_summary"

(via Arctotherium on X)


Fiscal impact by race in the US:

Only Whites and Asians make net positive contributions. Blacks and Hispanics collectively make a colossal $934 billion net negative contribution.

Currently, Asians who migrate to America are of higher socioeconomic status and above average intelligence in their respective homelands. However, if Asians were to mass migrate, they would likely make a net negative contribution. The average IQ of China is approximately 100, while the average IQ of India is around 76 (see: Most Accurate National IQs Possible).

Source: Fiscal Impact by Race in 2022 by Alden Whitfeld (follow him on X here)


Samples from The Genetic Origin of the Indo-Europeans are now available.

The paper claimed that Proto-Indo-Europeans received their Neolithic Anatolian ancestry via Neolithic Armenians, rather than Neolithic Europeans, but that doesn't seem to be the case for the Yamnaya. Early European Farmers of the neighboring Trypillia Culture are a likely source.

The Sredy Stog people did have minor ancestry from Neolithic Armenians, varying by subpopulation, but they too had Early European Farmer ancestry.

I wonder if the authors were trying to appease Anatolian Hypothesis believers? Possibly attempting to save face after the terrible Southern Arc paper by linking the two theories? Either way, it's obvious that the Indo-European languages originated in Europe.


"High IQ East Asian immigration" is championed by civic "nationalists," but what do East Asians have to offer the West, other than committing less crime than other migrant demographics? Politically, they're overwhelmingly left-wing and in favor of open borders (see here and here).

East Asians do have slightly higher average IQ than Whites, as confirmed by genetic testing. However, East Asian countries are less innovative than Western countries per capita, and are of lower socioeconomic development.

This study found that East Asians are lower in heritable psychological traits that lead to innovative behavior; inquisitiveness, psychological stability, and individualism. It has also been theorized that East Asians have less variable IQ, thus fewer genius outliers.



15 ta oxirgi post ko‘rsatilgan.