ResearchBased

How to Have Controversial Conversations With Your Significant Other


https://researchbased.co/blog/spouse-conversations/?feed_id=7&_unique_id=606ef49640da8

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche (V* creator) recently posted a letter to the WHO to stop mass va**ination of the COVID-19 Vackines (we have to purposely misspell words to avoid censorship). His letter has gotten a lot of attention in recent weeks. In an interview with Dr. Phillip McMillan, Dr. Bossche compared the mass COVID-19 Vaksinations to going into war with the wrong weapon. He warns that continuing with this strategy will have detrimental effects on a global scale. Since this interview came out, there have been some rebuttals that are questioning Dr. Bossche's intent. Some believe he may have ulterior motives as a V* creator himself, to promote his own NK Cell V* which he believes would be a better "weapon" to fight COVID. Here is an excerpt from his letter:

“Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table. Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know - or were not warned."

Immune escape is the ability of a virus to escape a person's immune response. In other words, Dr. Bossche is concerned that these vackseens are going to make our bodies incapable of recognizing or eliminating the COVID virus in the future. He goes on to explain that if he is right, we will be able to watch infectivity and morbidity rates in the countries who have succeeded in mass va_ _inations (UK, Israel, and the US). According to him, we will see a short decline in infectivity rates, but that will be followed by a steep incline in severe cases in the weeks to come.

Since this interview, the US has started to see an incline of 12.5% in cases, despite the increase in va**inations.It will be interesting to watch as this plays out. We hope to see more scientific debates on both sides in the coming weeks.

Sources:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/geertvandenbossche/detail/recent-activity/
http://bit.ly/GeertV
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/rebuttal-rosemary-frei-bossche-vaccination-concern/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GFrGTO9HGLI

ICAN recently served the CDC a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request. As a result, they received copies of many interesting emails from Dr. DeStafano, the director of the Immunization Safety Office at the CDC. Here's a small portion of what they found:

In a working draft called, “Manual for Active Va((ine Safety Surveillance,” it says, “The introduction of additional safety surveillance (including active safety surveillance) could potentially lead to negative impact on the public’s confidence in the va((ines and the willingness to participate in va((ination programs.”

From this we learn that Dr. DeStafano was concerned that as more adverse reactions to va((ines are reported, people may come to the conclusion that va((ine reactions do happen, more so than we realized, leading to a negative perception and less willingness to be va((inated. It is clear the CDC and pharmaceutical companies are aware that there is more injury than is currently being reported. Yet we still frequently hear the adage “one in a million.”

The second email gives us context about how many more than one in a million injuries there are. Speaking about ‘adverse events following immunization’ (AEFI) the email states, “Although extensive efforts were initiated to actively find cases of AEFI in multiple settings, underreporting remained a major limitation (e.g., more than 38,000 deaths within one month of va((ination would be expected in the eight countries; however, only 33 deaths were reported.”

The number of deaths that Dr. DeStafano was expecting is shocking in itself. It should be noted, these deaths may not necessarily be due to va((ination. However, the entire point of this email is adverse events following immunizations. It is apparent even if not all 38,000 deaths are due strictly to va((ination the CDC is convinced that many more than 33 deaths should be occurring due to va((ines.
Visit our blog post titled, "Adverse Events of the COVID-19 Va((ines" for more information.

Sources:
https://researchbased.co/blog/covid-vaccine-adverse-events/
https://foia.state.gov/Learn/FOIA.aspx
https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/18-00802-revised-only-b6-redactions.pdf

Was an Inert Placebo Used in the COVID-19 Vaccine Trials?


https://researchbased.co/blog/covid-vaccine-placebo/?feed_id=6&_unique_id=6052df01e19ba

Did you know there is a website dedicated to the reporting of any adverse effects from Va((ines? VAERS (Va**ine Adverse Event Reporting System) is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% of V* injuries. Openvaers.com is keeping a weekly count of COVID-19 Va((ine injuries. Here is the data they have posted on their website as of March 12th:

1524 Deaths
3477Hospitalizations
5806Urgent care
4748 Office Visits
292 Anaphylaxis
367 Bell’s Palsy

Source:
https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data

To sign up for our comprehensive guide, "Everything You Need to Know about the Covid-19 V*," head to our website!
https://researchbased.co/covid-19-vaccine-report

Moderna has announced a 94.5% efficacy rate for their V*.

Their analysis was based on 95 cases, of which 90 cases of COVID-19 were observed in the placebo group versus 5 cases observed in the V* group, resulting in a V* efficacy of 94.5%.

It is important to note, we are only looking at 95 participants out of approximately 30,000. This would also mean that the placebo is about as effective as the V*. (99.994% efficacy vs. 99.9997% efficacy in the V* group.)

Become empowered and knowledgable on these high profile Va((ines by signing up to read our guide, "Everything You Need to Know about the COVID-19 Va((ine." Link in Bio.

https://researchbased.co/covid-19-vaccine-report

Sources:
https://investors.modernatx.com/news-releases/news-release-details/modernas-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-meets-its-primary-efficacy

Pfizer V claims it is 95% effective. Their data was based on 170 participants out of the 44,000 recruited for the study. According to their study, the placebo seemed to be equally as effective as the V. The efficacy rate in the placebo group was 99.9923% and the efficacy in the V group was 99.99962%. What does this tell us?

Head to our guide, "Everything You Need to Know about the COVID-19 Vaccine" to learn more about Pfizer's data.

https://ln2.sync.com/dl/a79303940/uh5bdbux-y5yj5wuz-nzsu8b79-9sqr3fsi/view/doc/6155953270013

Sources:
https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-submit-emergency-use-authorization

Ever since we knew that there was going to be a v a ( ( i n e created for COVID-19 I have been dying to dig in and dissect the data. Now that the FDA has released its report on the various v******* I am ready to send out this guide.
Obviously this is an ever-changing situation and new data seems to appear every day, so there will be more that needs to be added to this document over time. However, this is a very detailed running start.

That being said, I would love your feedback if there's anything that you feel should be included and hasn't been. I have tried to make this document very source-heavy and not overstate anything, so feel free to share it with your friends, or have them sign up for our letter.

Now, dig in!

https://researchbased.ck.page/0c078c0a4d

Why Vaccines Replaced Placebos


https://researchbased.co/blog/vaccines-and-placebos/?feed_id=4&_unique_id=603fb34238c6d

Did you know many vaccines contain antibiotics?

Antibiotics are used in vaccine production to help prevent contamination during the manufacturing process. According to the JHU's School of Public Health’s 2018 vaccine excipient list, there are 18 vaccines licensed in the U.S that contain antibiotics as an ingredient- the most common being Neomycin.

Why does this matter?

In 1954, Sir Alexander Fleming, the Scottish physician and pharmacist who discovered penicillin, warned that the misuse of antibiotics would result in an "Antibiotic-Resistant Crisis". Antibiotic resistance occurs when an antibiotic drug loses its ability to effectively control or kill bacterial growth to which they were once sensitive.

Ironically the WHO and CDC are encouraging the use of vaccines as a strategy to address the antibiotic resistance crisis (despite the presence of antibiotics).

Although the FDA claims that antibiotics in vaccines are used in small amounts, the mere fact that the CDC’s 2018 recommended schedule has 50 doses of 14 vaccines before the age of six and 69 doses of 16 vaccines by the age of 18 create repeated exposure to antibiotics via vaccines during the childhood and adolescent years.

Sources:
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2018/02/the-antibiotic-resistance-crisis-and-vaccines/#_edn3
https://www.vaccinesafety.edu/components-Excipients.htm
https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance