TONGIFTDEGEN dan repost
Just my opinion, but I don’t think Layer 2 blockchains are necessary for $TON.
One of the biggest problems L2s introduce is liquidity fragmentation. Instead of capital being concentrated in one strong ecosystem, liquidity gets split across multiple networks, bridges, and pools. Over time, this can drain value and efficiency from the core ecosystem.
We’ve already seen this play out around Ethereum, where liquidity is spread across different L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism. While they help with scaling, they also divide liquidity, users, and incentives.
TON was designed with scalability at the base layer through sharding, so adding L2s might introduce unnecessary complexity rather than solving a real problem.
In my view, keeping liquidity concentrated on the main network could be more powerful for the long-term strength of the TON ecosystem.
One of the biggest problems L2s introduce is liquidity fragmentation. Instead of capital being concentrated in one strong ecosystem, liquidity gets split across multiple networks, bridges, and pools. Over time, this can drain value and efficiency from the core ecosystem.
We’ve already seen this play out around Ethereum, where liquidity is spread across different L2s like Arbitrum and Optimism. While they help with scaling, they also divide liquidity, users, and incentives.
TON was designed with scalability at the base layer through sharding, so adding L2s might introduce unnecessary complexity rather than solving a real problem.
In my view, keeping liquidity concentrated on the main network could be more powerful for the long-term strength of the TON ecosystem.