Forward from: Julie Kelly🇺🇲
I still cannot believe this passage by Andrew McCarthy is real.
Trump was over cooperating in the concocted documents investigation including allowing Jay Bratt and 3 FBI agents into Mar-a-Lago in June 2022 to search for more "classified" materials.
There was heated debate between FBI officials at the field level and top DOJ officials as to the necessity for an armed raid; Steven D'Antuono told Congress last year he opposed the raid because Trump and his lawyers were cooperating.
Also--THE FLA CASE DID NOT FAIL OVER THE IMMUNITY RULING. Judge Cannon dismissed the indictment in July by concluding--as did at least 2 former AGs and Justice Clarence Thomas--that Jack Smith's appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.
Why did McCarthy omit this?
And since neither federal case went to trial--how in the hell could the defense produce "exculpatory" evidence to exonerate the president? McCarthy also does not address the prosecutorial/investigative misconduct exposed in the documents case including tampering with evidence, perhaps destruction of evidence, misleading the court, and abusing the grand jury process by conducting the entire documents case in Trump-hating DC then switching to Florida at the last minute to get an indictment in the proper jurisdiction.
Apparently according to McCarthy it is "absurd" for a defendant to claim his innocence. Just wow
@Julie_Kelly2
Trump was over cooperating in the concocted documents investigation including allowing Jay Bratt and 3 FBI agents into Mar-a-Lago in June 2022 to search for more "classified" materials.
There was heated debate between FBI officials at the field level and top DOJ officials as to the necessity for an armed raid; Steven D'Antuono told Congress last year he opposed the raid because Trump and his lawyers were cooperating.
Also--THE FLA CASE DID NOT FAIL OVER THE IMMUNITY RULING. Judge Cannon dismissed the indictment in July by concluding--as did at least 2 former AGs and Justice Clarence Thomas--that Jack Smith's appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution.
Why did McCarthy omit this?
And since neither federal case went to trial--how in the hell could the defense produce "exculpatory" evidence to exonerate the president? McCarthy also does not address the prosecutorial/investigative misconduct exposed in the documents case including tampering with evidence, perhaps destruction of evidence, misleading the court, and abusing the grand jury process by conducting the entire documents case in Trump-hating DC then switching to Florida at the last minute to get an indictment in the proper jurisdiction.
Apparently according to McCarthy it is "absurd" for a defendant to claim his innocence. Just wow
@Julie_Kelly2