Sensum Communem

^^^ Loving this!

^^^ Been saying this for over a year now. Maybe I should finally remove my tinfoil hat?

^^^ All part of the scam. "Climate Crisis" had fallen flat on it's arse in order muster fear and anger in the normies, so COnVID was weaponised to provide the state of fear essential to set about their destructionist plans.

Then - mid pandemic - Klaus Schwab (the WEF's billionaire in chief) tells us that biological viruses are far less a threat to humanity than digital ones. Then - as the treatment programme for COnVID was underway - we see cyber attacks on energy and food supplies in the states. And while the mainstream media are lazily happy to scapegoat Chinese or Russian based hacker groups, personally, I would be digging in Schwab, and his white-cat stroking ilk's back gardens. You never know what you may uncover and who's really funding the cyber attacks. Cyber attacks that were strangely predicted by them, and have happened at ideal moments in time (i.e. just when COnVID hysteria is beginning to slow).

The evil-doers at the heart of The Monster have once again been trying to conflate Climate Crisis with the measures taken for COnVID, in order to procrastinate the now pointless and provably harmful lockdown measures. Unfortunately, outside of people who suffer from being of the hard of understanding, the normies have largely ignored this psy-op, because they are still in mental tatters over the psy-op job that put them into COnVID fear in the first place (courtesy of the Behavioural Scientists and Social Engineers in SAGE and NERVTAG - who have admitted as much, their psy-op was too effective).

So now they (The Monster), are now targeting supply chains with fear propaganda (another tome which was also intimated by Schwab - what a modern day Nostradamus he is). The reality is that the supply chains are not affected, and - providing people just buy what they usually would each week - there will be no shortages. However, what The Monster banking on, is that by saying the psy-op words "supply chain impact, leading to food shortages" will whip the same idiot fucking cunts (apologies, but that is exactly what they are), who went on a toilet paper, hand-sanitiser, and shelf stripping rampage back in March, to repeat their idiocy again now.

It was their very actions (back in March) that caused the shelves to be empty, not an impact on the supply chain. That was still running 24/7 just as it always had been, and if people had shown a modicum of common (and moral) sense, there would have been no shortages whatsoever, not even bog roll! Alas, that would require the same ethos that we had when we were a homogenised nation, and who had a sense of duty towards their fellow countrymen. Now it's, everyone for themselves, and it sickens me to the core!

And when all else fails, the ramp up of the UFO (aka UAP's Unidentified Aerial Phenomena) psy-op hysteria will then ramp up. Once again this will be an unseen enemy (like terrorism thousands of miles away, like a virus that's no worse than seasonal flu, etc.), but the normies will be corralled into acquiescing to even wider government controls, and - ultimately - even more global cooperation (to push us even further towards a One World Government).

This after all is their end game. That is why - joking aside - they should all (UN/WHO/WEF/IMF) be referred to as S.P.E.C.T.R.E.

^^^ My reply to the above YouTube Video (after I downvoted it). I expected to be blocked, and the comment deleted, for being far too rational for their wokeness! ^^^

——

Would it not be preferable to simply teach "critical thinking"? If that alone was taught - outside of any form subjectivism relating race, gender, sexual orientation, etc. - then surely the children would come to their own conclusions based on evidential fact, rather than someone else's beliefs? Colour me simple, colour me stupid, but I always thought that knowledge and fact were always better foundations - from an educational perspective - than guesswork and assumption?

I also find that pinning a message immediately after you posted your video - essentially saying: "I don't care about YOUR opinion!" - is the very thing that is wrong with atomised, modern day, western discourse. This is the epitome of snowflakism, and anyone wishing to actually have an "adult conversation", would not caveat their work with such a codicil.

If the materials that teachers use to teach are not subject to critique, then they become indoctrinators, not educators.

Luckily, I escaped the Marxification of the education establishment. Most of the teachers who taught me were probably left-leaning (although they'd probably be considered far-right "ists" or "phobics" by today's standards), but they were there to teach, and I thank them for the education that they provided me with.

For the objective based subjects (such as mathematics and the sciences), you were taught how to work out the problem, find the solution, and then prove your findings using inductive techniques.

For the subjective subjects (art, music, philosophy, etc.), we were taught not what to think but how to think . For example: a music teacher would play some Chopin, and then would ask the very simple question: "Did you like it?" Irrespective of whether a person liked that piece of music or not, the teacher would then say: "So, why did you like or dislike that piece of music? How did it make your feel?" There is no wrong answer - because music is subjective - but the real goal of teaching in this scenario, was providing you with the vocabulary to express your opinion (i.e. your critique) about the piece of music and why.

The teacher did not play some Chopin and then say: "You must like Chopin!" - which is essentially the mantra surrounding Critical Race Theory teaching. You either agree 100%, otherwise that makes you a bad person. There is no room for your views. We are right, and you are wrong. Again, this is indoctrination not education, and our children need a lot less of the former, and a lot more of the latter!

So if you are going to delete and block reasonable comments/posters, who are not abusive but have a differing view to your own, the please enjoy the echo-chamber that you create for yourself, and exacerbate your own self-entitlement of thinking that you are never wrong.