Репост из: Healing The Divide Channel
Geno Ong’s Unfortunate Suicide
Pertaining to Geno Ong’s suicide, where the press in Singapore and some private critics seems to have willfully distorted the truth to push thier bias narratives(becusse they are so against Iris’ stand on the danger of covid vaccines) .
Here is a summery I have concluded and simplified for the public in Singapore to better understand the actual circumstances facing Geno Ong’s shocking and unfortunate suicide:
Simplified Explanation for Public Understanding:
Raymond's Concession:
Hours before Geno's tragic decision, Raymond extended a significant concession to her. The offer required Geno to disclose the names of agents from the five government agencies she claimed to have collaborated with in covertly targeting Iris and Raymond. In return, Raymond agreed to drop the defamation lawsuits against her, sparing her from potential financial ruin.
Geno’s Response:
Geno’s lawyer communicated the terms of the concession, but instead of negotiating or accepting the deal, Geno made the ultimate decision to take her own life. Her suicide—what we might call “Geno-cide”—became her chosen response.
Rational Interpretations:
There are two logical explanations for Geno’s actions:
A) She Fabricated the Allegations:
Geno may have lied about the involvement of the five government agencies in order to discredit Iris and Raymond. When faced with exposure, the weight of her falsehoods and the impending shame proved unbearable, leading her to end her life.
B )She Feared Repercussions from the Government:
If the agencies did, in fact, collaborate with her, Geno likely feared the consequences of exposing a secretive, illicit operation against private citizens. The prospect of betraying the government and the backlash it could bring may have driven her to view suicide as the lesser of two evils.
Conclusion:
Regardless of the scenario, Geno’s actions point to a loss of moral integrity. Her decision to take her life was not driven by oppression from Raymond but rather by an inability to face the consequences of her own choices—whether it was her dishonesty, betrayal, or complicity.
In the end, Geno’s tragic act was an escape, not from persecution, but from accountability for lies, defamation, and alleged collusion against private citizens.
Koh Ken Kuan
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18DzobgTst/
Pertaining to Geno Ong’s suicide, where the press in Singapore and some private critics seems to have willfully distorted the truth to push thier bias narratives(becusse they are so against Iris’ stand on the danger of covid vaccines) .
Here is a summery I have concluded and simplified for the public in Singapore to better understand the actual circumstances facing Geno Ong’s shocking and unfortunate suicide:
Simplified Explanation for Public Understanding:
Raymond's Concession:
Hours before Geno's tragic decision, Raymond extended a significant concession to her. The offer required Geno to disclose the names of agents from the five government agencies she claimed to have collaborated with in covertly targeting Iris and Raymond. In return, Raymond agreed to drop the defamation lawsuits against her, sparing her from potential financial ruin.
Geno’s Response:
Geno’s lawyer communicated the terms of the concession, but instead of negotiating or accepting the deal, Geno made the ultimate decision to take her own life. Her suicide—what we might call “Geno-cide”—became her chosen response.
Rational Interpretations:
There are two logical explanations for Geno’s actions:
A) She Fabricated the Allegations:
Geno may have lied about the involvement of the five government agencies in order to discredit Iris and Raymond. When faced with exposure, the weight of her falsehoods and the impending shame proved unbearable, leading her to end her life.
B )She Feared Repercussions from the Government:
If the agencies did, in fact, collaborate with her, Geno likely feared the consequences of exposing a secretive, illicit operation against private citizens. The prospect of betraying the government and the backlash it could bring may have driven her to view suicide as the lesser of two evils.
Conclusion:
Regardless of the scenario, Geno’s actions point to a loss of moral integrity. Her decision to take her life was not driven by oppression from Raymond but rather by an inability to face the consequences of her own choices—whether it was her dishonesty, betrayal, or complicity.
In the end, Geno’s tragic act was an escape, not from persecution, but from accountability for lies, defamation, and alleged collusion against private citizens.
Koh Ken Kuan
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18DzobgTst/