COUNTERSPIN MEDIA (OFFICIAL)

ESTABLISHMENT EXCLUDES RECORD BREAKING DOCO - ARE YOU SURPRISED?

DailyWire+ documentary “Am I Racist?” has been snubbed from the Oscar shortlist, despite the film’s record-breaking box office success and massive cultural influence.

“Am I Racist?”, which features Daily Wire author and podcast host Matt Walsh exposing the DEI grift, outperformed any other documentary this year. Additionally, “Am I Racist?” is one of only 15 documentaries ever to open in over 1,500 theaters and earned the third-highest opening day gross for a documentary in the last decade. The shortlist is determined by Academy Documentary Branch members, who later decide the five Oscar nominees.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/am-i-racist-snubbed-from-oscar-shortlist-despite-record-breaking-success-walsh-reacts-a-farce?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR372xbsSGJXQKnprRiWv146Ws8HYFnHBEmXqpXz5-Lt9261uFZOmPSGuYM_aem_Sm1I77kQ75bSeG9gRfhjTA

FLUORIDE FREE NZ - PUT THESE DATES IN YOUR DIARY

US Lawyer Behind Groundbreaking Fluoridation Case Visits New Zealand

Michael Connett, the renowned US lawyer who led a historic legal battle against water fluoridation, is coming to New Zealand in February. This landmark visit offers Kiwis the chance to hear first hand from a lawyer who took on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a case that will lead to the end of water fluoridation in the US.


Connett’s legal win represents a monumental moment in public health advocacy. He spearheaded the lawsuit under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), arguing that fluoridation poses significant risks to human health, particularly for children. For the first time in US history, a Federal court undertook a risk assessment and agreed fluoridation poses “an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment” and ordered the EPA to take regulatory steps to “reduce or remove the threat posed by fluoridation”.


About Michael Connett
Michael Connett is an environmental lawyer with a passion for protecting public health and the environment. Over the past two decades, he has worked tirelessly to expose the dangers of fluoride and advocate for safer drinking water practices. His ground-breaking legal win in the US has paved the way for a global movement to end water fluoridation.

Join us in welcoming Michael to New Zealand and be part of this pivotal moment for public health.

More details here:

https://fluoridefree.org.nz/michael-connett/

THE LEGEND DARK JOURNALIST HOSTS AJ SHOW

https://banned.video/watch?id=6764b1dae2195351e8ae6cda

The emergency powers & Continuity of Government is an important issue to understand and the FAA announced they are banning drones and authorisung deadly force against them until January 17.

The Dark Journalist discusses the differences between the real UFO file compared to the CIA version.

Very good information.

A WIN FOR DEMOCRACY BASED ON ABILITY NOT ANCESTRY

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/northern-advocate/news/high-court-challenge-over-kaipara-district-council-abolishing-its-maori-ward-fails/CUBZZRMIHRET3GUIE242O26R4Q/

"The Kaipara District Council’s decision to controversially can its Māori ward has survived a High Court challenge by Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua.

Justice Neil Campbell rejected the rūnanga’s legal challenge of the council’s August decision.

In September Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whātua applied for a judicial review of the process the council used in its decision at a meeting on August 7 to scrap its Te Moananui o Kaipara Māori ward.

The rūnanga alleged the Kaipara District Council (KDC) made its disestablishment decision without consulting iwi and hapū, including Te Uri o Hau, Te Roroa, Ngāti Whātua, Ngātiwai, and Te Kuihi.

It said this breached the council’s legal obligations under the Local Government Act.

Contrary to high-profile lawyer Mai Chen’s argument for the rūnanga that there should have been a consultation process, Justice Campbell said in his December 18 decision that no precedent was created by the KDC’s past practice to require this.

“The council has consulted only once in the past on a Māori ward question.

“This was not a practice that was settled in the sense of being ‘regular and well established,” Justice Campbell said."

New article by Counterspin writers:

LESSONS FROM RHODESIA-ZIMBABWE

by Thomas S.

“Several years ago I worked for a farmer who had come to New Zealand some time ago as a refugee after fleeing from Robert Mugabe's genocidal regime in Zimbabwe. He arrived on our shores with practically nothing and even stayed in a tent with his wife and kids until he could set about building a new life for his family here in New Zealand.

“And while he did eventually manage to get some small amount of compensation through the international courts for the seizure of his farm by Mugabe's government, this was only a token amount considering the bloodbath and brutality which he and his family were forced to endure, both during the war, as well as during the regime which followed…”

To read more, go to CSM’s Substack at:

https://open.substack.com/pub/counterspinmedia/p/lessons-from-rhodesia-zimbabwe?r=28bz1v&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

or our blog at counterspinmedia.com/blog

WHANGREI DISTRICT COUNCIL STAYS STRONG ON ANTI FLUORIDATION STANCE

On Wednesday 18 December 2024, Whangārei District elected members voted to seek an interim injunction staying the Director-Generals directive on fluoridation of water supply until the New Health NZ judicial review against the Director-General has been decided.

The alternate motion was presented at an Extraordinary Council Meeting and follows a decision made on 28 November 2024, where Council resolved to not fluoridate the Whangārei District’s water supplies as required by the directive from the Director General of Health.

The motion instructs the Mayor and Chief Executive to write to the Ministry of Health and request an extension to the date when fluoridation of Whangārei water is to start. If this is not granted then an injunction would be sought on the grounds that the potential harm from fluoridation makes it unlawful for the Council to implement it pursuant to section 23 of the Health Act 1956, and that on the balance of convenience, the risk of harm far outweighs any minimal possible benefit to oral health.

Mayor Vince Cocurullo, who voted in favour of the motion, believes that health education is the pathway to better dental health for our community, and that fluoridating water supplies would not achieve the desired outcomes.

Full press release here:
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2412/S00699/council-maintains-anti-fluoridation-position.htm