This comes from
"Zoomerโs Book Corner" and I just have a strange feeling that he didn't exactly read (at least not all of) the entire book as he claims.
He seems to feel the need to explicitly mention parts of the book where Rosenberg/Himmler may have made pro-Christian statements but then does not want to reveal the anti-Christian parts within the same book.
Richard Steigmann-Gall writes that
Rosenberg could not have been a Christian for how much of Christianity he rejected and wanted to rewrite. And also writes on the topic of Himmler, that he himself was a
"paganist" that
advocated ancestor worship. Himmler is also documented to have said many anti-Christian remarks in the Holy Reich, and even talks about how Himmler changed his view from Christian in his early years, to an absolute pagan in the later years making
many speeches against Christianity (These Speeches are also within the Holy Reich)The implications of Zoomer Historian saying
"Hitler's relationship to Christianity over the years" to me seems to make me believe that he's implying that the book proves that Hitler is Christian, being that Zoomer Historian seems to strongly believe that Hitler was a Christian. But according to the author to the book,
Hitler became an apostate much later in the years of the Reich, but of course that is incorrect because
Hitler has always never been Christian since the beginning of his political career Now even despite the fact that there may have been a number of Pro-Christians in the NSDAP, the claim that Hitler, Rosenberg, and Himmler are Christians based on this poorly written book is just incorrect.
Also,
Bormann is not an Atheist, so I don't see where Zoomer Historian is getting that idea as shown in his post.
