National Education United dan repost
IN SUMMARY (compliments of Doddy the destroyer):
⚡️"Evidence not contradicted"
⚡️Claimant (under coercion) eventually took 'vaccine' and suffered negative immune response
⚡️Her contraindication was still refused!
⚡️(Woods of) "No thought (despite 'public service medal') for other measures"
⚡️Claimant "suffered psychiatric response"
⚡️Anxiety
⚡️In limbo (misconduct witch hunt dumped anyway)
⚡️"Lack of reasonableness"
⚡️"Onus upon respondent to provide proper witnesses to imply 'reasonableness'"
⚡️So...no witnesses...
⚡️Individual circumstances, generally overlooked (& ignored)
⚡️"Substantive issues not met" (by submission/respondent)
HERE'S WHAT POKEY, THE D.O.E LAWYER, SAID:
🦠"Causation" (P.H.O)
🦠Mandates ("true source") as cause of injury
🦠"Government is not the D.O.E"
🦠"D.O.E must comply"
🦠"The 'law' introduced a very limited window" (thus kneejerk cruelty)
🦠D.O.E sought, "safest return of face-to-face learning"
🦠D.O.E of "respectful/open dialogue" 🤪
endeavouring to communicate in clear and respectful way"😜
🦠"Applicant:
• believed in Ivermectin
• believed there was no C-19
• said no to mask-wearing
• attended rallies
[IT IS HERE THAT THE CLAIMANT BECAME DISTURBED AT BEING STALKED]
thus, "care falls at every step" (said Pokey)
🦠"Applicant unable to avail herself of contra-indication"
🦠[as to 6 months till mandates dropped] "facts that could not be known"
🦠"skillset could not be redeployed" (e.g: S.S.P)
🦠"Not necessary for [D.O.E] to redeploy someone in her circumstance"
🦠"Discipline" [her problem is with...]
Let us remember that the D.O.E,
& little Woody,
admitted that they informed staff before Berejiklian!
Thus, it was not the P.H.O (government) that caused the claimant their psychological injury;
it was the D.O.E!
And, it happened (at 10:56am 27/08/2021) at the workplace!
Remember?
The "Discipline", Pokey refers to,
only served to "re-traumatise",
due to the "coercion" and "incessant emails" (and phone calls from executive).
Sound familiar folks?
Besides,
"the onus is upon the respondent to show [injury] it was not caused" by the mandates/coercion.
And, they didn't even bother to cross-examine the patient's injuries!
Or produce a relevant witness
(Docky Wocky Wood rendered himself irrelevant to his executive position or testimony, as best his wittle mouthy could).
The D.O.E, Woody Puller and Pokey described lockdowns as "unusual",
thus why they couldn't redeploy the claimant (& the rest of us),
instead of harassing for misconduct (which they dropped anyway) or terminating people.
Yet, the months and months of lockdown - where no one was fired or attacked - were of these same 'unusual' circumstances.
And,
although Dr. Pale Wobbly cried and pointed and blamed his good mates Darly and Cachia,
it was deemed - at law - by Dodds that, "absent of those witnesses, they must not add value".
In other words, they were inadmissible as evidence.
Anyone watching Darly talk,
before the Portfolio Committee no.3,
might describe mummy's boy Darly as 'inadmissible'; even in person!
We rest our ('first test') case!
🔥💙
⚡️"Evidence not contradicted"
⚡️Claimant (under coercion) eventually took 'vaccine' and suffered negative immune response
⚡️Her contraindication was still refused!
⚡️(Woods of) "No thought (despite 'public service medal') for other measures"
⚡️Claimant "suffered psychiatric response"
⚡️Anxiety
⚡️In limbo (misconduct witch hunt dumped anyway)
⚡️"Lack of reasonableness"
⚡️"Onus upon respondent to provide proper witnesses to imply 'reasonableness'"
⚡️So...no witnesses...
⚡️Individual circumstances, generally overlooked (& ignored)
⚡️"Substantive issues not met" (by submission/respondent)
HERE'S WHAT POKEY, THE D.O.E LAWYER, SAID:
🦠"Causation" (P.H.O)
🦠Mandates ("true source") as cause of injury
🦠"Government is not the D.O.E"
🦠"D.O.E must comply"
🦠"The 'law' introduced a very limited window" (thus kneejerk cruelty)
🦠D.O.E sought, "safest return of face-to-face learning"
🦠D.O.E of "respectful/open dialogue" 🤪
endeavouring to communicate in clear and respectful way"😜
🦠"Applicant:
• believed in Ivermectin
• believed there was no C-19
• said no to mask-wearing
• attended rallies
[IT IS HERE THAT THE CLAIMANT BECAME DISTURBED AT BEING STALKED]
thus, "care falls at every step" (said Pokey)
🦠"Applicant unable to avail herself of contra-indication"
🦠[as to 6 months till mandates dropped] "facts that could not be known"
🦠"skillset could not be redeployed" (e.g: S.S.P)
🦠"Not necessary for [D.O.E] to redeploy someone in her circumstance"
🦠"Discipline" [her problem is with...]
Let us remember that the D.O.E,
& little Woody,
admitted that they informed staff before Berejiklian!
Thus, it was not the P.H.O (government) that caused the claimant their psychological injury;
it was the D.O.E!
And, it happened (at 10:56am 27/08/2021) at the workplace!
Remember?
The "Discipline", Pokey refers to,
only served to "re-traumatise",
due to the "coercion" and "incessant emails" (and phone calls from executive).
Sound familiar folks?
Besides,
"the onus is upon the respondent to show [injury] it was not caused" by the mandates/coercion.
And, they didn't even bother to cross-examine the patient's injuries!
Or produce a relevant witness
(Docky Wocky Wood rendered himself irrelevant to his executive position or testimony, as best his wittle mouthy could).
The D.O.E, Woody Puller and Pokey described lockdowns as "unusual",
thus why they couldn't redeploy the claimant (& the rest of us),
instead of harassing for misconduct (which they dropped anyway) or terminating people.
Yet, the months and months of lockdown - where no one was fired or attacked - were of these same 'unusual' circumstances.
And,
although Dr. Pale Wobbly cried and pointed and blamed his good mates Darly and Cachia,
it was deemed - at law - by Dodds that, "absent of those witnesses, they must not add value".
In other words, they were inadmissible as evidence.
Anyone watching Darly talk,
before the Portfolio Committee no.3,
might describe mummy's boy Darly as 'inadmissible'; even in person!
We rest our ('first test') case!
🔥💙